Roblox Lawsuit | Child Sexual Abuse and Grooming [2026 Update]

February 26th, 2026: Parents and Survivors Report Progress in Roblox Child Exploitation MDL Settlement Talks

Families of children and survivors involved in the multidistrict litigation alleging child sex exploitation on Roblox say settlement negotiations with the platform are advancing, although no deal has been finalized.

Plaintiffs across numerous coordinated cases argue that Roblox failed to implement effective age verification, moderation, and safety measures, and that these alleged failures contributed to unacceptable risks of grooming, exploitation, and other harms to minors.

According to parents and counsel, the parties have been engaged in ongoing discussions about potential resolution terms in the MDL, which consolidates hundreds of individual suits.

Plaintiffs’ advocates say negotiations reflect growing judicial and litigant interest in finding common ground without proceeding to dozens of individual trials, while critics emphasize that any settlement must meaningfully address both compensation and substantial safety reforms.

The reported talks come amid broader scrutiny of Roblox’s child safety practices, including prior testimony and public reporting about how predators allegedly misuse in-game chat and social features to contact and groom children.

Parents involved in the litigation continue to press for stronger age verification, better reporting and blocking tools, and clearer warning disclosures, arguing that these reforms are necessary to mitigate foreseeable harms and protect future users.

From a legal standpoint, robust settlement negotiations in an MDL of this scope can significantly influence the trajectory of the litigation, as parties may agree on common terms that shape compensation frameworks and injunctive relief.

However, plaintiffs’ representatives caution that negotiations are complex and that achieving a comprehensive settlement that satisfies all families and adequately addresses systemic safety concerns will require continued effort.

As talks continue, courts overseeing the MDL will monitor progress and may facilitate mediation or structured negotiations.

The outcome of these discussions could set important precedents for how digital platforms with large child user bases manage safety obligations, enforce protective measures, and resolve widespread civil claims alleging design failures and inadequate child protections.

February 25th, 2026:  Roblox Launches Global Parent Council to Enhance Family Engagement and Safety Oversight

Roblox has announced the launch of a Global Parent Council, an initiative intended to strengthen family engagement and improve online safety oversight across its platform.

The council, composed of parents, caregivers, and child safety experts from multiple countries, is tasked with advising Roblox on how best to support families in navigating the platform, enhancing transparency, and bolstering protections for young users.

According to Roblox, the council will focus on developing resources and guidelines that help caregivers understand and use the platform’s safety features, including parental controls, chat restrictions, and privacy settings.

It is also expected to provide feedback on policy and design decisions with the goal of making Roblox safer and more user-friendly for children and their families.

This development comes amid heightened scrutiny of online gaming environments and their role in child safety concerns, including grooming, exploitation, and harmful communications.

Plaintiffs in ongoing civil litigation against Roblox have frequently alleged that inadequate age verification, moderation tools, and safety disclosures contributed to foreseeable harm to minors.

While the Parent Council initiative is a proactive step toward involving stakeholders outside the company in safety discussions, it does not, by itself, resolve legal questions raised in existing lawsuits.

February 24th, 2026: UK Police Crime Logs Highlight Roblox Platform Safety Concerns

A recent investigation into police crime reports in England and Wales has revealed more than 1,500 recorded offences between 2020 and 2024 that reference the online gaming platform Roblox in the context of criminal investigations, with roughly one-third involving alleged sexual offences against children, including grooming, harassment, and alleged rape of minors.

Predators reportedly have used the platform’s virtual currency to coerce minors into explicit content or inappropriate interactions.

In several cases, police free-text logs describe children being pressured to send nude images in exchange for game currency and disturbing in-game interactions.

The reports show that contacts often begin within Roblox’s game environment and can move to private messaging or other platforms if children respond, raising questions about whether Roblox’s safety features (including facial age checks, chat limits, and monitoring) are sufficient to prevent foreseeable harm to young users.

Child safety advocates and authorities have emphasized the need for stronger platform accountability and regulatory enforcement, particularly under frameworks like the UK’s Online Safety Act.

These revelations are similar to ongoing civil litigation in the United States alleging inadequate child protection on Roblox.

Plaintiffs in these types of cases typically assert that the platform’s age verification and moderation tools are insufficient, that foreseeable risks of grooming and exploitation were not reasonably mitigated, and that marketing and design choices contributed to unsafe conditions for minors.

Roblox lawsuits often focus on failure to warn, negligent design, and inadequate safety measures, given the known risks inherent in interactive platforms popular with children.

February 21st, 2026: Los Angeles County Files Civil Enforcement Action Alleging Child Safety Failures on Roblox Platform

Los Angeles County has filed a civil enforcement action in California state court alleging that Roblox Corp. misrepresented the safety of its online gaming platform and failed to protect minors from sexual exploitation.

The complaint claims that Roblox marketed its platform as safe for children while permitting systemic exposure to adult predators.

The lawsuit alleges that default account settings, lack of age verification, and open communication channels allowed adults to contact minors without meaningful safeguards.

The complaint states that unverified accounts and the absence of required parental consent enabled children to create accounts and interact with unknown users.

Los Angeles County asserts that Roblox did not require phone number, email, or government identification verification, which allegedly allowed adults to create multiple anonymous accounts.

Los Angeles County seeks damages under California’s False Advertising Law and Unfair Competition Law. The complaint also alleges that Roblox created a public nuisance.

The county requests restitution, disgorgement of profits, civil penalties of up to $2,500 per false advertising violation, and injunctive relief requiring implementation of enhanced child safety safeguards.

The lawsuit references a 2024 short-seller report that characterized the platform as unsafe for minors. Los Angeles County alleges that Roblox delayed implementing meaningful reforms until after public scrutiny increased.

The complaint also alleges that certain user-generated experiences allowed simulated sexual conduct involving avatars and that user groups exchanged unlawful material.

Roblox disputes the allegations.

A company spokesperson told Law360 that Roblox has safety measures in place, prohibits image sharing in chat, monitors communications, and works with law enforcement when necessary.

Roblox states that safety remains a core focus of its platform operations.

February 20th, 2026: Los Angeles County Sues Roblox Over Child Safety Concerns

Los Angeles County has filed a civil lawsuit against Roblox Corporation, alleging the gaming platform exposes children to predators and harmful content.

The complaint claims Roblox has failed to implement effective moderation, age verification, and safety measures, leaving minors vulnerable to sexual exploitation and grooming.

County officials assert the company engaged in unfair and deceptive business practices by prioritizing growth and profit over child safety.

The lawsuit cites violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, seeking injunctive relief, abatement, and civil penalties.

Roblox has denied the allegations, stating the platform is designed with safety protections and monitors harmful content.

This case is part of a growing series of legal challenges against online platforms over child protection issues.

February 18th, 2026: Georgia Attorney General Investigates Roblox Over Child Safety Protections

The Georgia Attorney General has launched a formal investigation into Roblox, focusing on whether the online gaming platform failed to adequately protect children from predators and harmful interactions.

Officials are examining whether Roblox’s safety measures, including reporting tools, moderation protocols, and age assurance practices, were sufficient to address foreseeable risks to children using the platform.

The investigation aims to assess both the adequacy of Roblox’s current protections and whether violations of state consumer protection, child welfare, or deceptive practices laws may have occurred.

A state attorney general investigation could increase plaintiffs’ leverage in related litigation. It can also lead to potential enforcement actions, fines, or required changes to safety policies independent of private claims.

February 16th, 2026: Discord Rolls Out Age Verification Amid Rising Child Exploitation Lawsuits

Discord has announced plans to implement stronger age verification measures across its platform in response to safety concerns and emerging child exploitation litigation alleging that the company’s previous reliance on self-reported age information enabled adults to misrepresent themselves and interact with minors.

The move marks a significant shift for the messaging service, which has faced scrutiny from parents, safety advocates, and attorneys exploring claims tied to grooming and predatory conduct occurring in private or semi-private chat environments.

Under the updated policy, Discord will introduce enhanced age assurance tools designed to more reliably distinguish between adult and minor users and apply appropriate safeguards, such as limiting access to certain features or requiring additional verification steps.

The company says the changes aim to reduce the risk of adults posing as children and to make it harder for predators to exploit weak age controls that have been central to recent allegations.

The safety overhaul comes as law firms evaluate and file civil actions against Discord and similar platforms, asserting that inadequate age verification and moderation systems contributed to harm suffered by child users.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys argue that foreseeable risks tied to unverified accounts and unrestricted communications should have been addressed through more robust technology and clearer warnings, potentially preventing prolonged contact between adults and minors.

As these cases proceed, the rollout of stronger age verification highlights a broader industry trend toward improved safety protocols in digital environments used by children, and may become a focal point in evaluating platform responsibility in civil claims involving child exploitation and related harms.

February 10, 2026: Roblox Announces Move Beyond Self-Reported Age Verification — Legal Implications for Safety Claims

Roblox has announced that it is moving beyond relying solely on self reported age information, signaling a major change in how the platform intends to determine whether users are minors.

The company stated it plans to introduce stronger age verification measures to improve safety protections and better control access to age restricted features and experiences.

The announcement reflects growing scrutiny of Roblox’s child safety framework, particularly as the platform faces increasing allegations that adult users have been able to misrepresent their identities and target minors through in game communication tools.

Roblox’s decision to implement additional age verification technology suggests an acknowledgment that self reported age alone is not sufficient to prevent harmful interactions involving children.

This policy shift comes as Roblox remains the subject of consolidated litigation alleging that minors were groomed and exploited by adults on the platform.

Plaintiffs in these cases have frequently cited weak age verification and moderation practices as key failures that allowed predatory behavior to occur.

Roblox’s new approach may become a central issue in ongoing litigation, as parties examine whether prior safeguards were reasonable and whether stronger protections could have been implemented earlier.

The move is also part of a broader trend across the technology industry, as platforms serving child users face growing regulatory pressure and civil exposure to adopt more reliable age assurance systems.

February 6, 2026: Ninth Circuit Asked to Block Roblox Arbitration in Child Exploitation Lawsuit

A parent has urged the Ninth Circuit to uphold a lower court ruling preventing Roblox from forcing arbitration in a lawsuit alleging that his minor daughter was groomed and sexually exploited by adults on the gaming platform. The appeal centers on whether Roblox waived any right to arbitration and whether a parent can be bound to arbitration terms based on in app purchases made by a child.

The plaintiff argues that Roblox spent nearly a year actively litigating the case, including filing and losing a motion to dismiss, before attempting to compel arbitration. According to the brief, the district court correctly found that Roblox waived arbitration by seeking it only after unfavorable rulings in federal court. The parent contends that companies cannot pursue litigation first and then pivot to arbitration when court proceedings do not go their way.

The case also raises contract formation issues involving minors and digital purchases. Roblox claims the parent was bound to its arbitration clause through the purchase of Robux, the platform’s virtual currency.

The parent disputes this, stating that he never made the purchases, his daughter did, and that the purchase flow did not provide clear or reasonably conspicuous notice that users were entering into a binding contract with Roblox. He further argues that a child’s in app purchase cannot bind a parent to arbitration.

The lawsuit is part of a growing wave of claims by families alleging that children were groomed and exploited on Roblox despite the company’s representations about safety features and moderation. Similar cases have been centralized in a federal multidistrict litigation in California, reflecting increasing judicial scrutiny of online gaming platforms that host large numbers of child users.

More broadly, the appeal highlights mounting resistance to forced arbitration in child safety cases. Hundreds of parents have publicly criticized arbitration clauses, arguing that they shield companies from accountability and prevent public examination of platform safety practices. The Ninth Circuit’s decision may have significant implications for how technology companies attempt to use arbitration clauses in lawsuits involving alleged harm to minors.

February 5, 2026: Kidnapping Charges Filed After Online Gaming Contact Leads to Abduction

Authorities have charged a Nebraska man with kidnapping and related offenses after investigators allege he used Roblox to initiate contact with two minor sisters in Florida before abducting them.

According to law enforcement, the defendant communicated with the girls through Roblox over an extended period, gradually building trust before traveling to Florida and taking them across state lines without parental consent.

The case has intensified scrutiny on Roblox and similar online gaming platforms that allow direct messaging and interaction between users, including minors.

Investigators allege that the platform was used as an entry point for grooming, with conversations later continuing through other digital channels.

The children were eventually located during a traffic stop in another state and safely recovered.

While Roblox is not a defendant in the criminal case, incidents like this have been front and center in civil lawsuits against the gaming platform.

Lawsuits against Roblox focus on allegations that platforms failed to implement adequate safeguards, monitoring tools, or warnings to protect minors from foreseeable risks associated with unmoderated communication features.

February 4, 2026: Federal Judge Appoints Plaintiffs’ Leadership in Roblox Child Grooming MDL

A California federal judge has appointed plaintiffs’ leadership in the growing multidistrict litigation accusing Roblox of failing to protect children from grooming and sexual exploitation on its gaming platform.

U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg named five attorneys as co-lead counsel to oversee the consolidated proceedings, which were centralized in December.

The MDL currently includes dozens of lawsuits brought by parents and children alleging that adult predators were able to pose as minors on Roblox, gain children’s trust, and exploit them both on the platform and through linked services such as Discord.

Several cases allege severe abuse and, in some instances, suicide following prolonged grooming.

Plaintiffs argue that Roblox marketed itself as safe for children while failing to implement adequate safeguards or respond to known risks.

Judge Seeborg also directed the parties to propose an executive committee and liaison counsel, signaling that the court expects the litigation to expand further.

At the time of consolidation, cases were pending across nearly 20 federal districts, and multiple state attorneys general have filed or announced related actions against Roblox.

The leadership appointments mark an early procedural milestone in what is expected to be a large and complex MDL focused on platform safety, child protection duties, and whether Roblox’s design and moderation practices contributed to foreseeable harm.

February 3, 2026: Hundreds of Parents Urge Roblox Board to Stop Demanding Secret Arbitration

A coalition of about 800 parents sent this week a letter to Roblox’s board of directors, demanding the company stop trying to push child sexual exploitation lawsuits into confidential arbitration. 

The parents consist of families who have already filed suit and others who have retained attorneys and plan to sue.

Roblox currently faces over 100 lawsuits that were recently consolidated, with attorneys investigating thousands of additional claims involving alleged grooming and sexual abuse of minors on the platform.

The letter directly questions Roblox’s litigation tactic of filing motions to force arbitration, which would shift cases from public courts to private proceedings.

Attorneys representing the families argue that arbitration protects Roblox’s behavior from scrutiny and blocks victims from having their claims heard publicly.

Parents from various states stated that their children should have the right to tell their stories in court, not behind closed doors.

The letter follows a November ruling in a California federal court that rejected Roblox’s attempt to move a child exploitation case into arbitration under the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act.

Roblox has appealed that decision.

Parents claim that the appeal and ongoing arbitration efforts conflict with the company’s public statements about prioritizing child safety and community protection.

January 28th, 2026: Missing Boy Case Highlights Online Safety and Platform Liability Questions After Alleged Roblox Contact

A schoolboy’s disappearance following online interactions has drawn renewed attention to the safety risks associated with Roblox.

In the case of Thomas Medlin, CCTV footage and family accounts suggest that interactions originating in the online environment may have influenced real-world decisions, underscoring vulnerabilities in how such platforms manage user connections and communications.

While law enforcement continues the missing-person investigation, the circumstances highlight broader public-safety and legal concerns about platforms that allow unmoderated or poorly moderated communications between adults and minors.

In related civil claims against Roblox, plaintiffs often contend that insufficient protections enable predators to groom or exploit children, leading to physical danger, psychological harm, or both.

January 26, 2026: Muskegon County Family Sues Roblox Over Alleged Child Predator Access

A Muskegon County family has filed a lawsuit against Roblox, alleging the platform allowed an adult predator to contact and exploit their teenage child.

The complaint claims Roblox failed to implement adequate safety measures to protect minors from online predators, leading to harmful interactions.

The lawsuit asserts that Roblox’s communication features made it possible for the predator to target the teen, bypassing safeguards that should have prevented such contact.

The family seeks damages for the emotional distress and harm caused by the alleged failures of the platform to protect children in its care.

This case is part of a growing wave of litigation nationwide alleging that Roblox has historically allowed predators to exploit minors due to insufficient moderation, lax age verification, and unsafe default communication settings.

January 22, 2026: Utah Family Sues Roblox and Discord Over Alleged Sexual Exploitation of Child

A Utah family has filed a lawsuit against both Roblox and Discord, asserting that the companies’ platforms facilitated the sexual exploitation of their child. The complaint alleges that an adult predator used Roblox’s interactive environment to befriend the minor and then moved the communication to Discord, where sexually explicit conversations occurred and exploitation escalated.

The family claims that both companies failed to implement adequate safety controls or age-appropriate protections that could have prevented the predator from contacting and manipulating their child.

In the suit, the parents argue that Roblox’s design and inadequate moderation systems allowed an adult user to pose as a peer and build trust with the minor, while Discord’s open messaging and lack of robust safety filters enabled ongoing explicit exchanges.

The complaint asserts claims including negligence, negligent failure to warn, and negligent supervision, contending that the companies had a foreseeable duty to protect children given the known risks of predator activity and previous reports of similar incidents.

From a litigation perspective, the case highlights intersecting safety and liability issues across multiple digital platforms, illustrating how predators can exploit gaps in different services to target minors. Plaintiffs may seek discovery into platform policies, age-verification systems, and moderation practices, to show that design flaws and lax enforcement contributed to the harm.

As more families bring similar claims against social and gaming companies, courts will continue to grapple with the scope of duty owed and the adequacy of adult platforms’ protective measures for vulnerable users.

January 21, 2026: Man Accused of Using Roblox Chat to Lure Minors Faces Criminal Charges

Authorities in Mexico have charged a man for allegedly using the online gaming platform Roblox to contact and lure two girls, ages 10 and 16, from their home to Mexico City.

Law enforcement officials report that the suspect engaged the children through Roblox’s chat feature, gradually persuading them to leave their residence.

The girls were later located alive at a bus terminal with the suspect in custody.

Investigators allege that the suspect did not require technical expertise beyond access to the game’s communication system and the ability to maintain persistent online contact.

Authorities traced the digital interactions to Roblox, which helped identify and locate the missing minors.

This incident is similar to others across the United States.

Roblox is facing several lawsuits from families across the country who claim the company failed to protect minors from predatory activity within its chat and social features.

Parents and guardians are urged to monitor online interactions and educate children about the risks of meeting online acquaintances in person.

January 16th, 2026: Roblox Faces Sexploitation Lawsuit After Washington Girl Groomed by Predator

Roblox Corporation is facing a federal lawsuit after a 12-year-old girl from Snohomish County, Washington, was allegedly groomed by an adult predator on the platform.

The case, filed by the Dolman Law Group, claims Roblox failed to protect the minor from sexual exploitation.

According to the complaint, the predator sent explicit messages and images, coercing the girl to provide explicit photos of herself.

The lawsuit alleges the trauma led to multiple suicide attempts.

The family seeks unspecified damages for psychological and emotional harm, asserting that Roblox’s safety measures are inadequate and give parents a false sense of security.

The lawsuit is part of a broader trend of legal action targeting Roblox over child safety.

Similar cases have been filed in several states, including Louisiana, Kentucky, and Iowa, alleging that the company allows predators to exploit children on its platform and through connected chat applications.

Roblox has implemented safety measures such as default restrictions for younger users and facial age verification technology, but critics argue these steps are insufficient.

The company maintains that it uses AI moderation and human review to protect minors.

The case is ongoing in federal court.

January 15th, 2026: Report Shows Roblox Age Verification System Can Be Fooled, Highlighting Safety Gaps

A recent report reveals that Roblox’s age verification system, which is intended to protect children by distinguishing minors from adults, can be bypassed, raising fresh concerns about the platform’s ability to keep kids safe.

Investigators found that simple methods can trick the system into misclassifying underage users as adults, potentially exposing them to age-inappropriate interactions and content that the safeguards were supposed to prevent.

The findings underscore a broader pattern of safety deficiencies cited in lawsuits alleging that Roblox failed to implement effective age verification and moderation, allowing adults to pose as minors and groom or exploit children.

Plaintiffs in those cases argue that weak age checks are a foreseeable risk that contributes to harmful encounters, including inappropriate messaging and contact that migrate to other platforms.

From a litigation perspective, the report may be significant.

It suggests that Roblox’s technical measures may not meet reasonable standards for protecting minors, tightening arguments that the company’s duty of care was breached.

Courts examining these claims could examine whether the age-verification design was adequate, whether Roblox knew of bypass vulnerabilities, and whether stronger safeguards would have prevented harmful interactions.

The report also feeds into ongoing public and regulatory pressures on gaming and social platforms to adopt more robust, verifiable methods to prevent children from being exposed to open chat environments.

January 12, 2026: New Roblox Lawsuit Accuses of Sexual Exploitation of 10-Year-Old User

A new lawsuit filed on December 30 in the Northern District of California adds to the growing cluster of Roblox sexual exploitation cases now centered before Judge Richard Seeborg.

The complaint, filed by a parent on behalf of a 10-year-old girl named Jane Doe L.G., claims that Roblox’s platform allowed an adult user to contact, groom, and sexually exploit the child through in-game communication features.

According to the filing, the alleged predator used Roblox’s messaging and social tools to gain trust gradually, escalate sexual conversations, and pressure the child into exploitative behavior.

The lawsuit alleges Roblox failed to identify or stop the interaction despite warning signs, and that the platform’s design allowed private communication between adults and children with limited oversight and ineffective parental controls.

The complaint alleges negligence, failure to warn, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violations of consumer protection laws, and seeks both compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief.

The allegations reflect claims throughout the MDL, where families argue Roblox prioritized engagement and monetization while neglecting to put reasonable safeguards in place to protect minors from known and documented risks.

January 9th, 2026: Roblox Rolls Out Facial Age Check Feature Amid Safety and Liability Scrutiny

Roblox has begun implementing a facial age verification feature designed to improve safety on its platform by distinguishing between adult and minor users.

The system requires users to submit a live selfie that is matched against a government ID or similar verification method, with the goal of restricting access to age-inappropriate content and limiting interactions between adults and children.

Roblox says the feature is part of a broader effort to protect younger users from risks such as grooming, exploitation, and exposure to harmful material.

The company maintains that age-sensitive controls can help enforce existing safety filters and better tailor chat limitations and content restrictions based on verified age, rather than relying solely on self-reported birthdates.

From a litigation standpoint, the rollout comes amid mounting lawsuits claiming the platform failed to adequately protect children from predatory users.

Plaintiffs in those suits argue that weak age verification and lax moderation allowed adults to pose as minors, initiate inappropriate conversations, and, in some cases, groom children for offline contact or sexual exploitation.

A more robust age-checking system could be seen as one step toward mitigating foreseeable risk, though critics note it may be insufficient on its own to prevent all harmful interactions.

Legal challenges may focus on whether the new feature is effective in practice, how age data is stored and protected, and whether it fulfills reasonable duties of care under consumer protection or premises liability theories.

Courts could weigh the adequacy of age verification against allegations that the company’s design choices contributed to exploitable conditions for minors in online environments.

January 8, 2026: Roblox Lawsuit Filed Over Child Grooming Allegations

A federal lawsuit was filed against Roblox Corporation after a Cook County father alleged the platform enabled the sexual exploitation of his 9-year-old son.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by Dolman Law Group, claims Roblox created an unsafe environment that allowed a predator to groom the child while posing as a peer.

The lawsuit alleges Roblox prioritized profits over child safety and misrepresented the platform’s security measures.

According to the complaint, the child encountered sexually explicit solicitations after using Roblox in 2025 under the assumption that safeguards protected minors.

Roblox responded by emphasizing its safety policies. The company limits chat for younger users, prohibits user-to-user image sharing, and implements filters to block the sharing of personal information.

Roblox also stated it is developing facial age estimation tools and collaborates with law enforcement and child safety organizations to prevent sexual exploitation.

January 7th, 2026: Tennessee AG Sues Roblox Over Alleged Failures to Protect Children’s Privacy and Safety

Tennessee’s attorney general has filed a civil lawsuit against Roblox Corporation, accusing the company of misleading parents and failing to protect children on its platform.

The lawsuit was filed under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act and targets how Roblox markets safety while allegedly exposing minors to known risks.

The complaint alleges Roblox invited children onto the platform with promises of creativity and safe play while allowing predators easier access to minors.

State officials claim Roblox reduced moderation and safety resources through cost-cutting decisions, despite having long-standing knowledge of these risks.

Tennessee is seeking court orders forcing changes to Roblox’s practices, along with civil penalties and attorney fees.

The lawsuit argues the company had nearly two decades to address basic safety flaws but failed to implement adequate safeguards for children.

This case is part of a broader nationwide push by state attorneys general to enforce children’s privacy and safety laws.

Similar actions in other states and increased federal enforcement signal growing pressure on child-focused digital platforms to strengthen protections and be transparent about risks.