Actos Lawsuit

Actos (pioglitazone) is an oral diabetes medication in the class of drugs known as thiazolidinediones (TZD).

Diabetes is a disease in which the pancreas does not make enough insulin to control the level of glucose in the blood or when the body is unable to use insulin effectively.

Takeda’s Type 2 Diabetes drug, Actos (pioglitazone), grew in popularity after the use of Avandia, GlaxoSmith Kline’s controversial drug, was severely restricted in the United States because of concerns of an increased risk of heart attack and heart failure.

By late 2011, Avandia was no longer available through retail pharmacies. And then came Actos.

Waiting one day after Avandia received restrictions from the FDA, Takeda began a new advertising campaign for its diabetes product Actos.

Boasting taglines such as “Actos has been shown to lower blood sugar without increasing your risk of having a heart attack or stroke,” diabetes sufferers quickly shifted from Avandia to Actos.

However, like Avandia before it, the safety issues surrounding Actos have come to the attention of the FDA and have left the public questioning whether there is a diabetes drug worth the risk.

Table of Contents

Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit

The Actos bladder cancer lawsuit is largely inactive.

As of January 2018, only 18 cases remained in the federal court in Louisana.

TorHoerman Law is no longer accepting Actos cases.

If you have any questions, contact us.

Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Settlement

TorHoerman Law, one of the lead negotiators in a $2.4 billion settlement deal with Takeda, released a press release announcing the completion of a historic Actos bladder cancer lawsuit settlement.

Read the Press Release Here.

Actos Bladder Cancer Risk

On June 15, 2011, the FDA issued a Drug Safety Warning with regards to an increased bladder cancer risk associated with the use of the diabetes drug, Actos. 

This warning came after a review of data from a five-year interim analysis of an ongoing study of Actos by Takeda.

In the same year, Takeda was named in more than 10,000 Actos-related lawsuits.

The results showed that although there was no increased risk of bladder cancer among Actos users overall, there was an increased risk of bladder cancer amongst those who had used the drug the longest.

Independent researchers discovered that Actos users have a 40% higher chance of developing cancer after they have taken the drug for longer than a year.

There was also a greater risk of bladder cancer among Actos users who had been exposed to the highest cumulative dose of the drug.

Before the FDA warning – several European Markets, France and Germany, suspended the use of Actos, citing concerns over an increased risk of patients developing bladder cancer.

Studies continued to point toward Actos bladder cancer risks.

On July 5, 2013, an international independent study was published finding Actos to be “probably carcinogenic.”

In June 2013, 23 experts from nine countries met at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to assess the carcinogenicity of fourteen drugs and herbal products.

After a detailed review of one large randomized controlled study, four cohort studies, and three case-controlled studies, the Agency determined that pioglitazone (the active ingredient in Actos) should be classified as “probably carcinogenic” to humans based on the evidence that it causes bladder cancer.

Takeda had profited from sales of Actos in the U.S. of over $3 billion in 2009 and just under $3 billion in 2010.

Side Effects Associated with Actos

Possible side effects associated with Actos include:

  • Low blood sugar
  • Liver problems
  • Bladder cancer
  • Broken bones (fractures)
  • Diabetic eye disease with swelling in the back of the eye (macular edema)
  • The release of an egg from an ovary in a woman (ovulation) leading to pregnancy

A 2008 Swiss medical study was the first to uncover a link between Actos and bone fracture, finding that the drug could cause a double or triple risk of bone fracture in patients.

In 2010, Actos was linked to 243 cases of heart failure and 121 heart attacks.

What are diabetics supposed to do?

Is there a drug to help with the suffering that doesn’t set them up for new injuries?

What drugs can they safely turn towards to alleviate their struggles?

Sadly, it appears there is no clear answer at this time.

Given the history of diabetes drugs, diabetics have to seriously question and monitor the release of new diabetes medications, especially when the FDA is already requesting additional research.

Today’s diabetic must be informed.

If you are a diabetic, your focus should remain on your health.

It is always advisable to discuss any risks and concerns with your physician.

Share

Litigation Updates

Latest 3M Earplug Bellwether Trials see $50 Million and $8 Million Verdicts in Favor of Veterans

March 30, 2022

March 30, 2022

Latest 3M Earplug Bellwether Trials see $50 Million and $8 Million Verdicts in Favor of Veterans

FDA Provides Further Warnings after Second Infant Death, Abbott Expands Recall

March 3, 2022

March 3, 2022

FDA Provides Further Warnings after Second Infant Death, Abbott Expands Recall

FDA Advises Against Using Certain Baby Formulas, Abbott Issues Voluntary Recalls

February 24, 2022

February 24, 2022

FDA Advises Against Using Certain Baby Formulas, Abbott Issues Voluntary Recalls

Burn Pit Exposure to be Covered by New Congressional Bill Introduced in February 2022

February 21, 2022

February 21, 2022

Burn Pit Exposure to be Covered by New Congressional Bill Introduced in February 2022

Judge Refuses to Toss Toxic Baby Food Class Action, says Plum Organics’ Motion to Dismiss Insufficient

January 12, 2022

January 12, 2022

Judge Refuses to Toss Toxic Baby Food Class Action, says Plum Organics’ Motion to Dismiss Insufficient

FDA Formally Warns Medtronic, Claiming Improper Diabetes Facility Quality Requirements

December 16, 2021

December 16, 2021

FDA Formally Warns Medtronic, Claiming Improper Diabetes Facility Quality Requirements

CLIENT REVIEWS

quotation
Tom Lewis

TorHoerman Law was responsible for handling a medical case for our family. I was extremely impressed with their professionalism and ability to react quickly. They also did a nice job keeping us updated with the case throughout the process. This was the first time experiencing a situation like this and Tor Hoerman law did an excellent job from start to finish.

quotation
Jordan Terry

TorHoerman Law is an extraordinary law firm – a firm that truly makes the client’s best interests the primary concern. Their team of personal injury lawyers are experienced, personable, and well versed in a range of litigation areas. They are supported by a dedicated team of staff that are as equally friendly and helpful. I would recommend TorHoerman Law for any personal injury litigation needs.

quotation
Dave Woodley

All of my questions were answered quickly and in a way I could understand. Steve and the entire staff were friendly and professional.

quotation
Jordan Butler

I highly recommend this law firm! The attorneys and staff at THL worked hard, communicated every step of the process, kept me well informed at all times, and exceeded all expectations! The staff is kind, considerate, professional, and very experienced. Look no further, call now!

quotation
Maddy Moeller

Top-notch, hardworking attorneys!

quotation
Karen Hersman

A wonderful and professional legal team. They helped me when I needed expert legal representation! Thank you TorHoerman Law!

quotation
Angel Truesdale

They contacted me the next day. Very nice people!

quotation
Paul Graegin

The firm went above and beyond. Thank you for everything.

quotation
Carie Terry

The attorneys at THL were extremely helpful with the legal aspects of setting up my small business.

We'll Help You Balance The Scales of Justice

We're ready to fight for you. We're ready to be your ally. And we're ready to start right now.

Dont' waste time, contact our law offices today.

Edwardsville, IL

Chicago, IL

St. Louis, MO

Disclaimer: The contents of this webpage have been prepared by TorHoerman Law, LLC for informational purposes only. None of this information is intended as either legal or medical advice or opinions. No attorney/client relationship is established with use of this website. Sending or receiving information through this site, posting to our blogs/news site does not establish an attorney/client relationship. An attorney/client relationship with TorHoerman Law is established only by an express and written agreement by TorHoerman Law to represent you. Our attorneys make a case-by-case assessment of any claims and results may vary depending on the facts concerning any case. The attorneys at TorHoerman Law are licensed to practice in Illinois, Missouri, and California. In some circumstances, cases may be sent to other qualified lawyers. In those circumstances, TorHoerman Law maintains joint responsibility.