List of Military Bases with Contaminated Water by State

State-By-State List of Military Bases with Contaminated Water

This list categorizes military bases across the United States that have known or suspected contamination due to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) chemicals and other toxic substances.

Please note that the level of contamination varies significantly from one base to another, and this list does not detail specific contaminant levels or the types of PFAS found at each location.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has created an interactive map of U.S. military sites affected by known or suspected discharges of PFAS.

The list below touches on several cases of water contamination, primarily due to PFAS chemicals, but also other toxic substances that have been found in

Alabama

Military sites in Alabama have been significantly impacted by PFAS contamination resulting from the use of firefighting foam.

Remediation efforts are ongoing, and the city of Birmingham has taken legal action over the contamination of the airport.

Contaminated sites in Alabama include:

• Birmingham International Airport
• Fort Novosel (name changed from Fort Rucker in 2023)
• Maxwell Air Force Base
• Redstone Arsenal

Alaska

In Alaska, PFAS contamination has been a significant issue, particularly at military and airport facilities where aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) were used for firefighting and training exercises.

Notable sites include Eielson Air Force Base and the Alcantra Armory Complex, which have documented PFAS pollution affecting soil and groundwater.

Contaminated sites in Alaska include:

• Alcantra Armory Complex
• Eielson Air Force Base
• Fort Greely
• Galena Air Force Base

Arizona

In Arizona, PFAS contamination has been a significant environmental and public health concern, particularly at military and training sites where PFAS-containing aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) were historically used.

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) has been attempting to combat PFAS pollution through water system testing and mitigation efforts to meet new federal PFAS regulations.

The Environmental Working Group reported that at least seven Army installations in Arizona have been serving PFAS-contaminated drinking water.

The contamination, which occurred between 2016 and 2018, involves levels of PFAS that, while below the EPA’s health advisory, still pose potential health risks according to independent studies

Contaminated military sites in Arizona include:

• Buckeye Training Site
• Camp Florence
• Camp Navajo
• Fort Huachuca
• Papago Military Reservation
• Picacho Aviation Training Site
• Silverbell Army Heliport
• Yuma Proving Ground

Arkansas

In Arkansas, military bases such as Eaker Air Force Base and Little Rock Air Force Base are grappling with significant PFAS contamination, linked primarily to the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting practices.

Attorney General Tim Griffin has initiated legal actions against PFAS manufacturers like 3M and DuPont, aiming to hold them accountable for the environmental and health damages caused by PFAS chemicals.

Contaminated sites in Arkansas include:

• Eaker Air Force Base
• Little Rock Air Force Base
• Fort Smith Municipal Airport
• Pine Bluff Arsenal

California

California military bases and surrounding communities have suffered from significant PFAS contamination, due to the use of AFFF.

Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake is one of the most contaminated military sites in the country, deep in the Mojave Desert and used for weapons testing.

According to the U.S. Navy’s Environmental Restoration Program, there are over 200 individual sites targeted for remediation on the 1,700 square mile military base.

The California State Water Resources Control Board reported that 62 facilities in the state are known to or suspected to have a release of PFAS in water supplies.

Air Force Bases in California with PFAS contamination:

• Air Force Plant 42
• Beale Air Force Base
• Castle Air Force Base
• Channel Islands ANGS
• Edwards Air Force Base
• Fresno ANG Base
• George Air Force Base
• Los Angeles Air Force Base
• March Air Force Base
• March Air Reserve Base
• Mather Air Force Base
• McClellan Air Force Base
• Moffett Field ANG Station
• Norton Air Force Base
• Onizuka Air Force Station
• Ontario ANG Station
• Travis Air Force Base
• Vandenberg Air Force Base

Army bases in California with PFAS contamination:

• AFRC Los Alamitos
• Army Aviation Support ARNG Stockton
• Camp Roberts
• Camp San Luis Obispo
• Fort Hunter Liggett
• Fort Irwin
• Fort Ord
• Fresno ARNG TASMG
• Military Ocean Terminal Concord
• Roseville Armory ARNG
• Sacramento AASF
• Sharpe Army Depot
• Sierra Army Depot

Navy/Marine Corps bases in California with PFAS contamination:

• Alameda Naval Complex
• Azusa NCCOSC Morris Dam
• Concord NWS
• Coronado Naval Amphibious Base
• Crows Landing NALF
• Hunter Point NSY
• Long Beach NS
• Long Beach NSY
• Mare Island Naval Complex
• Marine Corps Air Station El Toro
• Marine Corps Air Station Tustin
• Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow
• MCAGCC Twenty Nine Palms
• MCAS Miramar
• MCB Camp Pendleton
• NAF El Centro
• Naval Air Station Lemoore
• Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake
• Naval Base Ventura County (Point Mugu, Port Hueneme, San Nicolas Island)
• NAVBASE Coronado
• NAVBASE Point Loma (SUBBASE)/SPAWAR (SSC)
• NAVBASE San Diego
• NAVCOMTELSTA Stockton
• NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach
• NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach Fallbrook
• NOLF Imperial Beach
• San Diego AUXLNDFLD NAVBASE Coronado
• San Diego FASWTC PAC NAVBASE Point Loma
• San Diego Nise-West NAVBASE Point Loma
• Treasure Island Naval Complex

Colorado

Several military installations in the state of Colorado have known or suspected PFAS contamination, impacting both water quality on-base and also in local communities nearby the military sites.

The state is actively testing water in surrounding communities, including Security-Widefield, and Fountain.

Potentially contaminated sites in Colorado include:

• Buckley Air Force Base
• Schriever Air Force Base
• Peterson Space Force Base
• Fort Carson
• U.S. Air Force Academy
• Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station
• Pueblo Chemical Depot
• Rocky Mountain Arsenal
• Lowry Landfill Superfund Site

Connecticut

Connecticut is facing potential water contamination from PFAS chemicals due to military installations and airports.

The state government is attempting to limit releases of PFAS chemicals to reduce exposure and environmental harm.

Connecticut military sites with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Stone’s Ranch Military Reservation
• Windsor Locks AASF

Delaware

In Delaware, PFAS contamination has been a significant concern.

The state has engaged in multiple efforts to address the contamination, including settlements with major chemical companies like DuPont, Corteva, and Chemours to fund cleanup and testing efforts.

Delaware’s approach includes the establishment of stringent state-level Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS in public water systems, which go beyond federal advisories.

Military installations in Delaware with potential PFAS contamination include:

• Duncan Armory AASF
• New Castle Airport

Florida

PFAS-contaminated water from military bases is a major concern in Florida.

Recent investigations have highlighted that these compounds have seeped into local water systems, potentially exposing countless civilians to toxic PFAS chemicals.

Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection is actively working with the Department of Defense to investigate and manage PFAS presence at military installations.

Military installations in Florida with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Camp Blanding
• Dover Air Force Base
• Eglin Air Force Base
• Hurlburt Field Air Force Base
• Jacksonville International Airport
• MacDill Air Force Base
• Marianna Readiness Center
• Naval Air Station Jacksonville
• Naval Air Station Pensacola
• Naval Air Station Pensacola (Saufley Field)
• Ocala Readiness Center
• Tyndall Air Force Base

Georgia

In Georgia, PFAS contamination at military sites is a pressing environmental and health issue, particularly at locations such as Moody Air Force Base, Robins Air Force Base, and Fort Gillem.

Significant concerns arise from the detection of PFAS in several public water systems across the state, including in cities like Rome, Columbus, and Augusta-Richmond County.

Georgia military installations potentially contaminated by PFAS chemicals include:

• Air Force Plant 6
• Camp Frank D. Merrill
• Dobbins Air Force Base
• Fort Gordon and Fort Gordon – Gillem Annex
• Fort Moore (formerly Fort Benning)
• Fort Stewart
• Fort Stewart-Hunter Army Airfield
• Moody Air Force Base
• Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay
• Robins Air Force Base

Hawaii

PFAS contamination at military bases in Hawaii, particularly at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, has been a significant environmental and public health issue.

An incident in November 2022 at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility involved a substantial spill of over 1,000 gallons of AFFF firefighting foam, exacerbating concerns about PFAS in the local environment and water systems.

The Navy has identified several areas around Pearl Harbor for potential PFAS contamination and is proceeding with environmental investigations under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund.

Military installations in Hawaii with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Fleet and Industrial Supply Center Pearl Harbor
• Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam
• Kalaeloa Facility (Former Barbers Point-NAS)
• Marine Corps Base Hawaii (formerly Marine Corps Air Station Kaneohe Bay)
• Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Pacific Pearl Harbor
• Navy Munitions Command
• East Asia Division Unit Pearl Harbor
• Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard and Intermediate Maintenance Facility

Illinois

PFAS exposure from contaminated water is an issue in Illinois.

According to reports, nearly 300,000 Illinois residents rely on well water that exceeds the state’s safety standards for PFAS in water.

The Illinois Attorney General has filed multiple lawsuits against companies that manufacture PFAS-containing products, particularly AFFF foam, arguing that these companies knew about the dangers yet continued to promote their products as safe.

In 2020, Senator Dick Durbin met with the U.S. Air Force Secretary to discuss PFAS contamination at Scott Air Force Base.

Military sites in Illinois with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Chanute Air Force Base
• Peoria International Airport
• Rock Island Arsenal
• Scott Air Force Base

Indiana

Multiple military installations in Indiana may be contaminated with PFAS compounds.

Contractors working on Camp Atterbury detected PFAS in groundwater, raising alarms about potential health risks to nearby communities and the environment.

Indiana’s Attorney General has filed lawsuits against multiple companies accused of producing and distributing PFAS-containing products.

Military sites like Grissom Air Reserve Base and others in Indiana continue to be a focus of PFAS investigations and cleanup efforts.

Military installations in Indiana with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Camp Atterbury/Range 36 ATG
• Fort Benjamin Harrison
• Fort Wayne Air National Guard Base
• Grissom Air Reserve Base
• Shelbyville Army Aviation Support Facility

Iowa

PFAS exposure through contaminated water is a concern in Iowa.

Military installations, such as the Iowa Air National Guard bases in Des Moines and Sioux City, have been hotspots for PFAS contamination.

Contaminated sites in Iowa include:

• Des Moines International Airport (132d Wing)
• Sioux City National Guard Base

Kansas

Several sites in Kansas have been potentially contaminated by PFAS compounds.

This issue is especially pronounced at locations such as Fort Riley and Fort Leavenworth, where 10 types of PFAS were found in the water.

Military sites in Kansas with known or suspected PFAS exposure include:

• Forbes Field
• Fort Leavenworth
• Fort Riley

Kentucky

PFAS contamination at military sites in Kentucky, notably Blue Grass Army Depot, Fort Campbell, and Fort Knox, has become a concern.

Blue Grass Army Depot has undergone assessments to understand the scope of PFAS presence in water supplies.

Fort Knox has reported minimal PFAS contamination.

Military sites in Kentucky with potential or known PFAS contamination include:

• Blue Grass Army Depot
• Fort Campbell
• Fort Knox

Louisiana

PFAS contamination in Louisiana is a public health and environmental concern.

Among the most notable sites is the former England Air Force Base near Alexandria, which recorded some of the highest PFAS levels in the country, with concentrations of PFHxS reaching 20.7 million parts per trillion in 2016.

Barksdale Air Force Base, which, like many military installations, has a history of using PFAS-laden firefighting foams – both groundwater and surface water around the base have been affected by PFAS.

Military sites with PFAS contamination in Louisiana include:

• Barksdale Air Force Base
• Camp Minden
• England Air Force Base
• Fort Polk

Maine

Maine is facing environmental and health concerns with PFAS originating from military installations.

At Loring Air Force Base, investigations revealed PFOS and PFOA levels significantly above EPA health advisory limits, primarily due to the historical use of PFAS-containing firefighting foams.

Similar contamination issues have been identified at the Brunswick Naval Air Station, where firefighting foam is also the suspected source of PFAS pollution, with PFOS concentrations ranging from 650 to 24,000 parts per trillion.

Contaminated military sites in Maine include:

• Bangor Air Guard Training Site
• Brunswick Naval Air Station
• Loring Air Force Base

Maryland

Many military sites in Maryland have suffered from PFAS contamination.

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Fort Meade, and Naval Research Laboratory Chesapeake Bay Detachment have reported high levels of PFAS contamination in groundwater.

Groundwater monitoring wells near former fire-training areas at Fort Meade have shown PFAS levels as high as 87,000 parts per trillion.

Naval Research Laboratory Chesapeake Bay Detachment has identified areas with significant PFAS contamination from routine firefighting foam use, affecting both on-base and off-base water supplies.

Numerous sites in Maryland are contaminated with PFAS:

• Aberdeen Proving Ground
• Camp Baker
• Camp Fretterd Readiness
• Fort Detrick
• Fort Meade
• Phoenix Military Reservation
• Frederick Readiness Center
• Gunpowder Military Reservation
• Joint Base Andrews
• La Plata Readiness Center
• Naval Research Laboratory Chesapeake Bay Detachment
• Queen Anne Readiness Center
• SSG Isadore S. Jachman Reserve Center
• US Naval Academy

Massachusetts

Several sites in Massachusetts have been identified as containing significant PFAS levels in groundwater and drinking water due to the historical use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting exercises.

At Westover Air Reserve Base, for example, extensive testing revealed PFAS concentrations significantly above the EPA’s advisory level.

Former Naval Air Station South Weymouth is undergoing remediation under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), with the Navy collaborating with state regulators to address and manage the contamination.

Massachusetts with PFAS contamination include:

• Hanscom Air Force Base
• Naval Air Station South Weymouth
• Rehoboth
• Westover Air Reserve Base

Michigan

PFAS contamination in Michigan has been linked to several military sites.

One of the most heavily impacted sites is the former Wurtsmith Air Force Base in Oscoda, where PFAS levels in groundwater have reached up to 213,000 parts per trillion.

K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base in the Upper Peninsula has also been identified with substantial PFAS contamination.

Battle Creek Air National Guard Base and Selfridge Air National Guard Base have reported high levels of PFAS.

Senators Debbie Stabenow and Gary Peters have introduced bills to expedite PFAS remediation at the most contaminated military sites.

Contaminated military sites in Michigan include:

• Alpena County Regional Airport
• Battle Creek Air National Guard Base
• Belmont Armory
• Camp Grayling
• Detroit Arsenal
• Grand Ledge Army Aviation Support
• Jackson Readiness Center
• K.I. Sawyer Air Force Base
• Lansing Airport Hangar
• MTC-H Camp Grayling-Cantonment
• MTC-H Camp Grayling-MATES
• Selfridge Air National Guard Base
• Wurtsmith Air Force Base
• W.K. Kellogg Airport

Minnesota

PFAS contamination in Minnesota from areas like Duluth International Airport, Minnesota Army National Guard Facilities, and more has become a public health concern.

At Duluth International Airport, PFAS levels have been recorded at 5,400 parts per trillion for PFHxS.

The state has engaged in legal actions to hold manufacturers accountable for PFAS contamination, including an $850 million settlement from 3M to provide clean drinking water and to restore damaged natural resources, particularly in the eastern suburbs of the Twin Cities.

Contaminated areas in Minnesota include:

• Camp Ripley
• Duluth Air National Guard Base (Duluth Intl. Airport)

Mississippi

PFAS contamination in Mississippi has raised substantial environmental and health concerns.

Columbus Air Force Base and Gulfport-Biloxi International Airport have reported significant levels of PFAS in groundwater and drinking water sources.

Columbus Air Force Base has seen PFAS concentrations far exceeding the EPA’s advisory levels.

Potentially contaminated sites in Mississippi include:

• Camp McCain
• Camp Shelby
• Columbus Air Force Base
• Gulfport Regional Airport
• Keesler Air Force Base
• Key Field Air National Guard Base

Missouri

Water contamination from military installations in Missouri is an issue.

At Whiteman Air Force Base, the use of PFAS-laden firefighting foams has resulted in contamination of local water supplies, affecting both the on-base population and nearby communities.

Richards-Gebaur Air Force Base has also shown high PFAS levels.

Other sites in Missouri, including Fort Leonard Wood, are also being investigated for PFAS contamination in water.

Missouri sites with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Fort Leonard Wood
• Lake City Army Ammunition Plant
• Rosecrans Memorial Airport
• Whiteman Air Force Base

Montana

Many sites in Montana may be contaminated with PFAS compounds.

At Malmstrom Air Force Base, PFAS contamination has been identified in groundwater.

The Montana Air National Guard has also reported significant PFAS contamination at multiple sites due to the use of firefighting foam.

Military sites in Montana with known or suspected contamination include:

• Fort Harrison
• Former Glasgow Air Force Base
• Montana Air National Guard Base (Great Falls)
• Helena Army Aviation Support Facility
• Limestone Hills Training

Nebraska

PFAS exposure and contamination has become a concern at military bases in Nebraska.

Offutt Air Force Base, near Omaha, is one of the most affected sites in Nebraska, with PFAS detected in both soil and groundwater above EPA limits.

Military sites in Nebraska with PFAS contamination or potential contamination include:

• Nebraska Army National Guard Training Site (Greenlief)
• Nebraska Army National Guard Training Site (Mead)
• Offutt Air Force Base

Nevada

PFAS contamination in Nevada has significantly impacted several military sites.

At Naval Air Station Fallon, PFAS levels in groundwater were detected at nearly 15,000 times the EPA’s recommended lifetime health advisory limit for combined PFOA and PFOS.

In 2021, legislation was passed in the state to prohibit the use of PFAS in firefighting foam and certain consumer products.

Military sites in Nevada with known or suspected contamination include:

• Nellis Air Force Base
• Creech Air Force Base
• Naval Air Station Fallon

New Hampshire

Multiple military bases in New Hampshire have been impacted by PFAS contamination.

The contamination at Pease Air Force Base prompted the establishment of the Pease Restoration Advisory Board, a community-focused group working alongside military and state officials to address contamination concerns and ensure public safety.

Another significant site is the Newington Air National Guard Base, where similar PFAS contamination concerns have been reported.

Sites in New Hampshire with known or suspected contamination include:

• Center Strafford Training Site
• Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
• Newington Air National Guard Base
• Pease Air Force Base

New Jersey

New Jersey’s long industrial history has led to widespread contamination of local water supplies, with military bases being major contributors.

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, Naval Air Warfare Center Trenton, and Earle Naval Weapons Station, among others, are key contamination sites.

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst has reported some of the highest PFAS levels in the country, with groundwater contamination reaching up to 264,300 parts per trillion (ppt).

Trenton Mercer Airport was found to have significant PFAS contamination in monitoring wells, with levels up to 27,800 ppt.

New Jersey has taken aggressive steps to address PFAS contamination.

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has set some of the nation’s strictest health standards for PFOS, PFOA, and PFNA.

Legal actions have been initiated against the federal government and chemical manufacturers to hold them accountable for the contamination and to fund cleanup efforts

Contaminated sites in New Jersey may include:

• Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst – McGuire
• Picatinny Arsenal
• Naval Air Warfare Center Trenton (now Trenton Mercer Airport)

New Mexico

PFAS contamination in New Mexico has been a significant issue, especially at military sites such as Cannon Air Force Base, Holloman Air Force Base, Fort Wingate, and White Sands Missile Range.

At Cannon Air Force Base, groundwater testing revealed PFAS levels more than 370 times what federal scientists consider safe for a lifetime of exposure, affecting nearby private wells and the Highland Dairy, which had to euthanize over 3,000 cows due to contamination in the herd and their milk.

Holloman Air Force Base has reported even higher contamination levels, with PFAS concentrations up to 1,294,000 parts per trillion in groundwater—more than 27,000 times the EPA’s lifetime advisory level.

Fort Wingate and White Sands Missile Range are also under investigation for PFAS contamination.

The following New Mexico locations are known or suspected to have PFAS contamination:

• Cannon Air Force Base
• Fort Wingate
• Holloman Air Force Base
• White Sands Missile Range

New York

PFAS contamination in New York has significantly impacted numerous military sites.

Countless military bases in New York have reported PFAS levels in drinking water and groundwater that exceed the EPA’s health advisory limits.

At the Seneca Army Depot, contamination has been particularly severe, with PFAS levels in the local water supply significantly above state maximum contaminant levels.

The depot used large quantities of PFAS-containing firefighting foam, which has led to widespread environmental contamination.

New York has been proactive in addressing PFAS contamination through regulatory actions, public health advisories, and legislative measures.

Military sites in New York with documented or potential PFAS exposure include:

• Camp Smith
• Fort Drum
• Gerry Reserve Center
• Griffiss Air Force Base
• Hancock Field Air National Guard Base
• Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station
• Plattsburgh Air Force Base
• Seneca Army Depot
• Stewart Air National Guard Base
• West Point Military Academy

North Carolina

North Carolina has a troubling history of water contamination due to military operations.

Major military bases such as Fort Bragg, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, and Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point have reported substantial levels of chemical contamination in groundwater and drinking water sources.

Camp Lejeune, in coastal North Carolina, was home to a water contamination event that lasted over 30 years and exposed nearly one million military personnel, civilian workers, and others to highly toxic water.

This resulted in the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, which aims to compensate victims of Camp Lejeune water contamination for related health problems.

We are no longer accepting new cases for the Camp Lejeune Lawsuit, but we have experience handling cases for several veterans and their family members.

Military bases in North Carolina with suspected or documented PFAS water contamination include:

• Camp Mackall
• Fort Bragg
• Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point
• Seymour Johnson Air Force Base

North Dakota

PFAS contamination in North Dakota has impacted several military sites and surrounding communities.

Contamination has been detected at locations such as the North Dakota Air National Guard Base in Fargo, Grand Forks Air Force Base, and Minot Air Force Base, among others.

At the North Dakota Air National Guard Base near Hector International Airport in Fargo, tests have revealed high PFAS concentrations in groundwater.

Grand Forks Air Force Base and Minot Air Force Base have also documented significant PFAS contamination.

Military bases in North Dakota with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Camp Davis
• Camp Grafton
• Hector Field International Airport
• Minot Air Force Base

Ohio

PFAS contamination in Ohio is a critical environmental and public health issue.

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base has been at the forefront of PFAS studies, including pilot projects to extract and treat contaminated groundwater.

Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base has also reported significant PFAS levels in its water sources.

Military bases in Ohio with suspected or documented PFAS contamination include:

• Camp Ravenna
• Camp Tarlton
• Rickenbacker Air Force Base
• Toledo Express Airport
• Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

Oklahoma

Several military bases in Oklahoma, including Tinker Air Force Base, Altus Air Force Base, and McAlester Army Ammunition Plant, have been impacted by PFAS.

Military sites in Oklahoma with known or suspected contamination include:

• Altus Air Force Base
• Camp Gruber
• Fort Sill
• Midwest City Readiness Center
• Tinker Air Force Base
• Tulsa International Airport
• Vance Air Force Base

Oregon

PFAS contamination in Oregon, particularly at military sites, has become a significant environmental and public health issue.

Various military installations have reported PFAS contamination due to the historical use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) in firefighting activities.

Key sites include Kingsley Field Air National Guard Base in Klamath Falls, where tests conducted in 2018 found PFAS levels in groundwater exceeding the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) lifetime health advisory limits.

Legislative actions at the state level have been enacted in Oregon to regulate PFAS use and contamination.

The state has also filed a lawsuit against 21 companies for toxic chemical contamination.

Locations in Oregon with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Christmas Valley Air Force Station
• Kingsley Field Air National Guard Base
• Lebanon Motor Pool
• Portland International Airport
• Roseburg Armory
• Salem Anderson Readiness Center

Pennsylvania

PFAS water contamination is a concern for the state of Pennsylvania.

One of the most notable sites is the former Naval Air Warfare Center in Warminster Township, Bucks County, which has been identified as a major source of PFAS pollution due to the use of firefighting foams.

This contamination has affected local drinking water supplies, leading to PFAS levels far exceeding the EPA’s health advisory limits.

Similarly, Horsham Air Guard Station and the Willow Grove Naval Air Station have been hotspots for PFAS contamination.

Areas in Pennsylvania with known or suspected military PFAS contamination include:

• Horsham Air Guard Station
• Scranton Army Ammunition Plant
• Willow Grove Naval Air Station

Puerto Rico

PFAS contamination in the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico is an issue due to military operations.

Located in Ceiba, the Naval Station Roosevelt Roads was one of the largest naval bases in the Atlantic until its closure in 2004.

Contamination near this base, and Fort Buchanan, stems from the historical use of AFFF firefighting foam.

The Puerto Rican government has filed lawsuits against various companies responsible for producing and distributing PFAS chemicals.

The Biden-Harris administration has allocated nearly $19 million to improve water infrastructure in Puerto Rico, targeting emerging contaminants like PFAS.

Rhode Island

Rhode Island has identified 36 known PFAS contamination sites, many of which are linked to historical military activities.

Naval Station Newport, a complex Superfund site, has significant contamination from a 2.5 million gallon tank farm and fire suppression systems used during World War II.

Quonset State Airport and Charlestown Auxiliary Landing Field, both former military training and emergency response sites, have also been identified with high levels of PFAS contamination.

Areas in Rhode Island with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Charlestown Auxiliary Landing Field
• Coventry Training Site
• Naval Station Newport
• North Smithfield Air Guard Station
• Quonset State Airport

South Carolina

South Carolina is facing several PFAS contamination sites due to military activities.

Fort Jackson, one of the largest and most active initial entry training centers in the U.S. Army, is potentially contaminated with PFAS and other chemicals due to the use of firefighting foam and explosives testing.

This contamination has led to high levels of PFAS in the groundwater, posing serious health risks to those stationed there​.

Shaw Air Force Base and Charleston Air Force Base have reported significant PFAS levels.

South Carolina military sites with potential or confirmed PFAS contamination include:

• Charleston Air Force Base
• Fort Jackson
• McCrady Training Center
• Myrtle Beach Air Force Base
• Shaw Air Force Base

South Dakota

South Dakota has multiple documented military sites with PFAS contamination.

Located near Rapid City, Ellsworth Air Force Base has reported PFAS levels in groundwater reaching 551,000 parts per trillion, among the highest in the country.

Joe Foss Field near Sioux Falls is also under investigation for PFAS contamination.

Potentially contaminated sites in South Dakota include:

• Ellsworth Air Force Base
• Joe Foss Field Air National Guard Base

Tennessee

Multiple military installations in Tennessee are reporting PFAS levels or testing for forever chemicals in their water supply.

Arnold Air Force Base, known for its advanced testing and research facilities, has detected PFAS in its water systems.

Fort Campbell, straddling the Tennessee-Kentucky border, has also faced PFAS issues.

The Tennessee Air National Guard facilities, including the 118th Wing at Berry Field Air National Guard Base, have been involved in state and federal initiatives to assess and mitigate PFAS contamination.

Tennessee military sites with potential PFAS contamination include:

• Arnold Air Force Base
• Fort Campbell

Texas

In Texas, PFAS contamination is a significant issue, particularly at several military installations.

These sites have reported high levels of PFAS in groundwater and drinking water due to firefighting foam usage.

At Reese Air Force Base in Lubbock, PFAS concentrations were found to be as high as 7,280 parts per trillion (ppt).

Dyess Air Force Base near Abilene reported contamination levels of 448,200 ppt.

The bases comprising Joint Base San Antonio, including Lackland and Randolph, also showed significant contamination, with levels at Lackland reaching up to 680,000 ppt and Randolph up to 182,000 ppt​.

Goodfellow Air Force Base was another site where PFAS contamination has been detected, requiring monitoring and remediation efforts​.

Military bases in Texas with potential or confirmed PFAS contamination include:

• Camp Bowie
• Dyess Air Force Base
• El Campo Training Site
• Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base
• Fort Hood
• Grand Prairie Armed Forces Reserve Complex
• Joint Base San Antonio
• Kelly Air Force Base
• Randolph Air Force Base
• Red River Army Depot
• Sheppard Air Force Base

Utah

PFAS containing firefighting foam is the primary cause of PFAS contamination in and around Utah military bases.

Hill Air Force Base, one of the largest military installations in the state, has reported PFAS levels in its groundwater.

Camp Williams, another important military site in Utah, has also detected PFAS contamination in its groundwater.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) reports that the levels of PFOS and PFOA at the Salt Lake City International Airport have prompted state and federal authorities to initiate detailed environmental assessments and remediation actions

Military sites in Utah with known or suspected PFAS contamination include:

• Camp Williams
• Hill Air Force Base
• Dugway Proving Ground
• Salt Lake City International Airport

Vermont

PFAS contamination in Vermont is a significant environmental and public health issue, particularly affecting military sites.

One of the primary sites is the Burlington International Airport, where PFAS contamination in groundwater has reached levels as high as 72,000 parts per trillion, due to the historical use of AFFF by the Vermont Air National Guard and an 800-gallon spill by the National Guard.

This contamination has impacted local wells and the Winooski River.

Organizations like the Vermont Military Poisons Coalition have mobilized to raise awareness about the health risks associated with PFAS and to push for stronger regulatory actions.

Potentially contaminated military sites in Vermont include:

• Burlington International Airport
• Camp Ethan Allen
• Chittenden County National Guard Base

Virginia

PFAS contamination in Virginia has been linked to several military installations.

Joint Base Langley-Eustis, one of the primary sites affected, has reported extremely high levels of PFAS in both soil and groundwater.

Samples from this site have revealed PFOS concentrations as high as 2,225,000 parts per trillion.

Oceana Naval Air Station and the nearby Fentress Naval Auxiliary Landing Field have both shown elevated PFAS levels in groundwater samples.

Testing revealed PFAS contamination in private wells around these bases, prompting the Navy to provide alternative drinking water to affected residents.

Potentially contaminated military sites in Virginia include:

• Fort AP Hill
• Fort Lee
• Joint Base Langley-Eustis
• Naval Air Station Oceana
• Naval Auxiliary Landing Field Fentress

Washington

PFAS contamination in Washington state has been a significant environmental and public health concern.

At Joint Base Lewis-McChord, extensive testing revealed PFAS concentrations in both on-base and off-base water supplies.

Fairchild Air Force Base has similarly identified significant PFAS contamination, necessitating environmental assessments and implementation of water treatment systems to ensure the safety of drinking water for military personnel and nearby communities.

Naval Air Station Whidbey Island has also faced challenges with PFAS contamination, with elevated levels detected in local water sources.

In 2021, the Washington State Board of Health adopted State Action Levels (SALs) for five PFAS compounds, mandating public water systems to test for these chemicals and take action if contamination is found.

Potentially contaminated military sites in Washington state include:

• Fairchild Air Force Base
• Fort Lewis
• Joint Base Lewis-McChord
• Montesano Armory
• Naval Air Station Whidbey Island

West Virginia

According to a report by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), PFAS has been detected at 67 sites across the state, including several military installations.

The study, conducted in collaboration with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), sampled 279 public water systems and identified high PFAS levels in 37 sites, with some exceeding the EPA’s health advisory levels.

One notable site is the West Virginia Air National Guard Base in Martinsburg, which has undergone extensive testing and remediation efforts due to high PFAS levels detected in groundwater.

The contamination primarily resulted from the use of AFFF.

To address the issue, the West Virginia legislature has passed several resolutions and laws, including Senate Concurrent Resolution 46 and the PFAS Protection Act (HB 3189), which mandate statewide PFAS testing and the development of comprehensive remediation plans.

Potentially contaminated military sites in West Virginia include:

• West Virginia Air National Guard Base (Martinsburg)
• Eastern West Virginia Regional Airport

Wisconsin

Multiple military sites in Wisconsin have been investigated for PFAS contamination.

Truax Field Air National Guard Base and Fort McCoy have been identified as notable sources of PFAS contamination due to AFFF firefighting foam.

In addition to military sites, PFAS contamination in Wisconsin has been detected in various other locations, including industrial sites and municipal water systems.

Military sites in Wisconsin with potential or confirmed PFAS contamination include:

• Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport
• Fort McCoy
• Truax Field Air National Guard Base
• West Bend Armory

Wyoming

PFAS contamination in Wyoming due to military operations is an emerging concern.

Military sites such as F.E. Warren Air Force Base have been identified with significant PFAS levels due to AFFF firefighting foam.

PFAS runoffs at Cheyenne Municipal Airport are also a concern.

Were You Exposed to PFAS Contamination at a Military Installation?

Lawsuits are being investigated for military service members, civilian workers, local communities, and others impacted by military PFAS water contamination.

If you or a loved one developed cancer or other serious health problems after drinking contaminated water on or near a military base, you may be eligible to take action and seek compensation.

Reach out to the Water Contamination Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Water Contamination claim instantly.