PFAS Lawsuit [November 2024 Update] | PFAS Contamination Lawsuits

Recent reports have raised significant concerns about the widespread contamination of American farmland by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.”

For decades, municipal sewage, treated and repurposed as fertilizer, has been spread across millions of acres of farmland, under federal encouragement, due to its nutrient-rich content.

However, emerging research indicates that this practice has introduced high levels of PFAS into the soil, with potential health risks for both humans and livestock.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals used in various industrial and consumer products, including nonstick cookware, firefighting foam, and water-resistant fabrics, these substances are known for their resistance to breaking down, leading to their accumulation in the environment and in human and animal bodies.

PFAS exposure has been linked to an increased risk of certain cancers, birth defects, and developmental issues in children.

Farmers across the country, particularly in states like Texas, Michigan, Maine, New York, and Tennessee, are beginning to realize the extent of this contamination.

In some cases, PFAS have been detected at high levels on farmland, with reports of the chemicals affecting livestock health and contaminating produce.

In response to the contamination, several lawsuits have been filed against the suppliers of the sewage-based fertilizer and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The lawsuits allege that the EPA failed to adequately regulate the presence of PFAS in these fertilizers, thereby allowing the contamination to spread unchecked across the nation’s farmlands.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products like AFFF firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey has signed a new law that aims to phase out the use of PFAS chemicals in firefighters’ protective gear.

PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are industrial compounds widely known for their water and stain-resistant properties but have been linked to severe health risks, including various types of cancer.

The legislation, effective January 2025, will require manufacturers and sellers of firefighting gear to disclose the presence of PFAS and provide a reason for its use.

By 2027, the sale of gear containing intentionally-added PFAS will be banned in the state.

This law highlights the growing concern over the health implications of PFAS, which are often referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and the human body.

Firefighters, who are frequently exposed to PFAS through their gear and firefighting foam, face a heightened risk of developing cancers such as kidney, testicular, and breast cancer.

The regulation is part of a broader movement to address PFAS contamination across various industries.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also proposed limits on PFAS in drinking water, reflecting increasing federal and state efforts to mitigate the dangers posed by these chemicals.

The impact of Massachusetts’ law could extend beyond firefighting equipment, influencing ongoing PFAS-related litigations and prompting other states to adopt similar measures.

The focus on eliminating PFAS from everyday products, including clothing, cookware, and personal care items, aligns with the growing legal and regulatory scrutiny of these toxic substances.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products like AFFF firefighting foam, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has initiated a new project to test drinking water near U.S. Army bases for contamination by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals.”

These substances have been linked to increased risks of cancer and other serious health issues.

The testing will begin at nine Army installations but is expected to expand to 235 locations nationwide.

PFAS contamination has been a significant concern, particularly near military bases where aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) containing PFAS was used extensively to combat fuel fires.

This foam has been identified as a major source of PFAS contamination in water supplies, posing health risks to military personnel, their families, and nearby communities.

The affected military bases in the initial testing phase include Fort Novosel in Alabama, Fort Hunter Liggett in California, and Fort Stewart in Georgia, among others.

The EPA has set new, legally enforceable drinking water limits for PFAS, and this project aims to determine whether the water near these bases meets the new standards.

If PFAS levels exceed the Maximum Contaminant Levels established, the Army and environmental regulators will work with state officials to address the contamination.

This initiative is part of a broader legal landscape surrounding PFAS contamination.

Aqueous film-forming foam lawsuits have been centralized before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in South Carolina for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

These cases involve allegations that exposure to PFAS-containing AFFF firefighting foam used at military bases, airports, and firefighting training centers have led to severe health issues, including various forms of cancer.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

We are also accepting new clients for the AFFF Lawsuit. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

States across the nation are increasingly taking action against harmful chemicals known as “PFAS,” which have been found in drinking water, rivers, and lakes.

These chemicals, also known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, are linked to serious health risks, including cancer and developmental issues.

States taking action include:

• North Carolina A report from the Environmental Working Group reveals that drinking water for 2.5 million North Carolinians is contaminated with PFAS, surpassing the EPA’s new safety standards.
• Pennsylvania Water Systems Exceed Standards Testing in Pennsylvania shows that nearly 19% of water systems contain PFAS levels above the new EPA regulations. The highest contamination was found in smaller communities and mobile home parks, with some levels far exceeding federal limits.
• Contamination in Massachusetts Water Recent EPA data indicate that drinking water in Eastern Massachusetts contains PFAS levels above the proposed federal limits. The contamination affects numerous water systems across the state, highlighting the widespread presence of these “forever chemicals” in public water supplies.
• PFAS Widespread in New Jersey The latest EPA data show widespread PFAS contamination in New Jersey’s public water systems. The contamination is concentrated in North Jersey but is present statewide.
• Wisconsin Rivers and Lakes A study by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found that PFAS levels in natural foam on rivers and lakes are significantly higher than in the water itself, sometimes up to 7,000 times higher.
• Minnesota Proposes PFAS Water Pollution Permits The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has proposed a new water pollution permit for 3M’s Cottage Grove plant, which continues to manufacture PFAS. The permit mandates advanced water treatment to remove PFAS to undetectable levels.
• WVU Researchers Identify PFAS Hot Spots in U.S. Researchers from West Virginia University have identified several PFAS contamination hot spots in the U.S., primarily in densely populated and industrialized areas. The study found that communities relying on groundwater are particularly vulnerable.

Additionally, a report by Milliman estimates that the cost to remediate PFAS contamination in U.S. water systems could reach up to $175 billion.

The report also notes the challenges insurers face in quantifying potential liabilities related to PFAS exposure and remediation.

The EPA and U.S. Army has also launched a joint project to test water near Army installations for PFAS contamination, with the initial phase targeting nine priority sites, with the potential for expansion.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

New research reveals new dangers resulting from PFAS.

Groundbreaking research reveals that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can seep through human skin and enter the bloodstream.

PFAS absorption through the skin challenges the previous understanding that these chemicals primarily entered the body through contaminated food, water, and air.

The study used cultured human skin models to examine the absorption potential of 17 commonly used PFAS compounds.

Shorten carbon-chained compounds showed higher absorption percentages into the bloodstream than longer-chained compounds.

PFAS have been linked to various health issues, including cancer, infertility, high cholesterol, low birth weights, and adverse effects on the liver, thyroid, and immune system.

The study’s findings raise concerns about routine exposure to PFAS through products that come into direct contact with the skin, such as cosmetics, water-repellent clothing, and hand sanitizers.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently set its first-ever limit on PFAS in drinking water, reflecting growing awareness and regulatory action against these chemicals.

Currently, only eight states have enacted policies to restrict PFAS in personal care products.

Consumers can reduce their PFAS exposure by:

• Choosing PFAS-free personal care beauty products.
• Supporting policies that limit PFAS in consumer goods can drive broader changes to protect public health and the environment.
• Avoiding products with PFAS, such as certain cosmetics and water-repellent clothing.

If you or a loved one were exposed to PFAS contamination in water or through PFAS containing products, you may be eligible to file a PFAS Lawsuit and seek compensation.

Contact the PFAS Lawyers at TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a PFAS Lawsuit instantly.

Recent reports indicate that toxic “forever chemicals” known as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) continue to persist in the groundwater around the Ōhakea airforce base, with levels rising in some areas.

PFAS, used in firefighting foam, were first discovered by the Defence Force in local drinking water supplies in 2017.

PFAS are known to persist in the environment and the human body for centuries, potentially increasing the risk of cancers, raising cholesterol levels, impairing immunity, and delaying children’s development.

Regular testing around Ōhakea has detected PFAS in seven bores, with concentrations in some areas exceeding drinking water standards by 2-3 times.

In response to the contamination, bottled water was provided from 2018, and a $12 million piped water scheme was opened in 2022.

This situation parallels similar contamination issues at other military bases globally, including Devonport and Whenuapai.

The Air Force is ramping up efforts to address PFAS contamination following the implementation of new federal guidelines by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The new standards, introduced in April, set stricter limits on PFAS exposure in drinking water.

The Air Force has acknowledged that these chemicals, used in aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) for firefighting, have contaminated water supplies on and around military bases.

The Air Force has found PFAS contamination at 191 out of 204 inspected installations since 2015. 

If PFAS levels exceed the action threshold due to Department of Defense activities, measures such as connecting residences to municipal water supplies or installing filtration systems will be implemented.

The Air Force is also investigating other sources of PFAS contamination at active and closed installations, in collaboration with the Department of Defense.

Cleanup efforts are prioritized at locations posing the greatest risk to human health, with ongoing coordination with regulatory agencies and affected communities.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Edwardsville, IL (TorHoerman Law’s primary office location) and Glen Carbon, IL, are actively responding to new regulations set on July 10, 2024, in which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) mandated new regulations to limit PFAS chemicals in drinking water.

Known as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment, PFAS are linked to serious health risks, including endocrine disruption, hormone production and transport, and various cancers.

The EPA’s directive will cost municipalities nationwide an estimated $1.5 billion annually to monitor and control PFAS levels.

During a July 25 board meeting, Glen Carbon’s trustees decided to retain several law firms to address PFAS contamination.

This decision follows the EPA’s April ruling that established legally enforceable drinking water standards for PFAS.

In Edwardsville, water samples taken since 2021 have detected PFAS, with PFOA levels recorded at 0.0055 parts per billion.

City Engineer Ryan Zwijack confirmed that Edwardsville’s current water treatment facilities cannot remove PFAS, but the city will adhere to EPA and Illinois EPA guidance on future sampling and treatment.

Glen Carbon, which buys treated water from Illinois American Water, is also affected.

The company plans to invest over $40 million to upgrade its water treatment facility in Granite City, monitoring PFAS levels closely.

Both towns plan to construct new water treatment facilities to meet the EPA’s new maximum contaminant levels.

Municipalities like Glen Carbon and Edwardsville are joining other cities in filing claims against PFAS manufacturers. 

This legal strategy aims to hold the manufacturers accountable for contamination and the subsequent health impacts.

According to Matthew Maas, director of the SIUE Environmental Resources Training Center, advancements in testing technology will likely reveal PFAS in more locations.

This ongoing battle against “forever chemicals” highlights the progress made in water safety, focusing now on long-term, chronic health effects rather than acute health threats.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) is making great strides in improving drinking water safety by tackling PFAS contamination.

PFAS, often called “forever chemicals,” can cause serious health problems, including issues with development, the immune system, and cancer.

Traditional methods to struggle to remove these chemicals, especially the short-chain types.

NJIT, led by Associate Professor Arjun Venkatesan, has developed a new pre-treatment process that enhances existing water filters.

By adding a special chemical to the water, this process helps remove both short-chain and long-chain PFAS more effectively.

The Suffolk County Water Authority has supported this research by providing a testing site with additional resources.

Early results are promising, showing a 170% improvement in removing harmful short-chain PFAS.

This new method is cost-effective and easy to integrate into current water treatment systems, potentially reducing maintenance costs by 50%.

NJIT’s approach aligns with the latest EPA regulations, aiming to improve water quality nationwide.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Recent research conducted by environmental chemists from the University of Birmingham reveals that per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals,” can be absorbed through human skin.

PFAS are synthetic chemicals found in various consumer products, including skincare items, cosmetics, and waterproof clothing.

Known for their persistence in the environment and the human body, these chemicals pose significant health risks.

The study found that many of these compounds could indeed be absorbed through the skin, challenging previous assumptions about the skin acting as a barrier.

The study reported that daily contact with products containing PFAS could lead to substantial exposure over time.

Once absorbed, PFAS can disrupt hormone systems, lower immune responses to childhood vaccinations, reduce birth weights, and alter liver function.

Notably, PFOA has been designated as “carcinogenic to humans” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Many lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers for the widespread contamination and health impacts associated with PFAS exposure.

Regulatory bodies, particularly in the European Union, have already begun regulating certain PFAS in drinking water.

This study’s findings underscore the need for manufacturers and regulators to reassess the risks associated with PFAS, especially those with shorter chain lengths that might be more easily absorbed through the skin

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The California State Water Resources Control Board recently issued a report alerting nearly one million Californians about water sourced from failing systems at the start of this year.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has imposed new requirements for per- and poly-fluoralkyl substances (PFAS), which are man-made chemicals found in everyday items.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” pose significant health risks due to their persistence in the environment and human body.

As of January 1, 385 public water systems in California are considered failing.

These systems primarily serve small, rural communities, with many relying on bottle d water and boiled water advisories.

These affected areas include:

• Kern County: 60 systems
• Tulare County: 32 systems
• Fresno County: 31 systems
• Madera County: 28 systems.

The report highlights that 50% of the communities served by failing systems are communities of color.

Additionally, these systems are more likely to serve disadvantaged communities compared to those that have been removed from the failing list.

Providing clean water to the affected communities is estimated to cost $11.5 billion.

The State Water Resources Control Board has proposed distributing $855 million in financial assistance over the next year to address drinking water needs in disadvantaged communities and emerging contaminants.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States.

Recent court cases across Europe underline significant gaps in the regulatory framework governing per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS), often referred to as ‘forever chemicals’ due to their persistence in the environment.

Despite the widespread use and environmental impact of PFAS, particularly in products like firefighting foams, current laws are insufficiently equipped to manage their risks effectively.

In Denmark and Sweden, legal actions have underscored the health risks and environmental contamination associated with PFAS.

In Korsør, Denmark, PFAS contamination from a firefighting training site compromised the quality of meat from a local community farm, with detected levels high enough to impair immune responses in residents, including children.

Similarly, in Sweden, the Swedish Armed Forces faced legal repercussions for contaminating municipal water supplies with PFAS, leading to significant remediation costs covered by tax and water fees.

The existing legal structures allow for the continued use and disposal of PFAS without adequate oversight of their long-term environmental and health impacts.

This has led to widespread contamination, with over 23,000 PFAS-contaminated sites identified in Europe alone.

The call for a more stringent regulatory approach is growing louder. Experts advocate for a global ban on PFAS chemicals and a shift towards more sustainable alternatives.

The European Union, following a Swedish initiative, has banned 200 PFAS compounds; however, this represents just a fraction of the over 15,000 PFAS substances currently in use.

Legal reforms are urgently needed to prevent further pollution and ensure that manufacturers and other polluters bear the costs of environmental cleanup and health impacts.

This includes retrospective liability for past contamination and more cautious approval processes for new chemicals.

The ongoing PFAS lawsuits not only seek to address specific instances of contamination but also push for systemic changes to prevent future harm.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

Consumers and public water systems have recently filed class action lawsuits against several companies, including RiseWell LLC, Bic USA Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Kenvue Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, and Chemguard Inc.

These lawsuits allege the companies either contaminated public water systems with per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) or manufactured products containing “forever chemicals.”

Class Action Key Details:

• A class action lawsuit claims that RiseWell’s children’s toothpaste contains harmful PFAS, despite advertising the product as natural and chemical-free.
• Bic is accused of failing to disclose that its razors contain PFAS.
  • The lawsuit highlights that Bic informed the Maine Department of Environmental Protection about the intentional use of PFAS in its products. The plaintiffs argue that PFAS are unsafe and pose a health risk.
• These companies face a lawsuit over allegations that their Band-Aid products contain dangerous PFAS, the lawsuit claims the presence of PFAS renders the products unfit for their intended use and poses a health risk.
• Public water systems have sued Tyco Fire Products LP and Chemguard Inc.
  • The lawsuit accuses the companies of prioritizing profits over human health and the environment.

Continuing Developments:

• BASF agreed to pay $316.5 million to settle claims that it contaminated public drinking water systems with PFAS.
  • The settlement covers public water systems that detected PFAS before May 15, 2024. BASF will make an initial payment of $4 million by July 15, 2024, and the remaining $312.5 million by March 1, 2025.
• The EPA has finalized the first-ever regulations for PFAS in drinking water.
  • Public drinking water systems have three years to complete initial monitoring for PFAS and five years to implement the new regulations.
  • By 2027, public water systems must begin informing the public about PFAS levels in their drinking water.

Our law firm is currently investigating PFAS water contamination cases, specifically near military bases across the United States. 

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

The Air Force is implementing new techniques to address PFAS contamination at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, in response to updated EPA standards for PFAS levels in drinking water.

To date, the Air Force has spent nearly $59 million at Wright-Patterson to identify and mitigate PFAS, part of a $2.2 billion nationwide effort.

PFAS, known as “forever chemicals” for their persistence in the environment, have been found above guideline levels at three wells on the base.

The Air Force has initiated a remedial investigation to fully delineate PFAS presence in soil, groundwater, and surface water.

Twenty-six AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) release sites at Wright-Patterson have been investigated under the EPA’s Superfund process.

Over 170 monitoring wells have been installed, and extensive sampling has been conducted, including 480 soil samples and 313 groundwater samples.

In response to the new EPA standards, which require public water utilities to test for six types of PFAS, the Air Force has installed carbon treatment systems on two on-base wells.

The service is also implementing removal actions at five on-base locations to prevent PFAS migration to Dayton’s water supply wells.

Dayton has sued Wright-Patterson and the U.S. Department of Defense for $300 million over PFAS contamination, with the case now part of a multi-district litigation in South Carolina.

The Air Force’s efforts include providing alternative drinking water, funding filtration system installations, and implementing interim response actions to prevent further PFAS migration in groundwater.

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

Recent investigations reveal widespread contamination of U.S. drinking water systems with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), affecting states including North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts.

These chemicals, often referred to as “forever chemicals,” persist in the environment and pose significant health risks, including liver changes, increased cholesterol, and heightened risks of kidney and testicular cancer.

Some states are considering stricter PFAS regulations:

• North Carolina: Over 2.5 million residents are exposed to PFAS levels exceeding EPA standards, with significant contamination in Wilmington and Pittsboro. Efforts to address the issue are entangled in political and economic debates.
• Pennsylvania: Reports indicate that nearly 19% of water systems contain PFAS concentrations above federal limits. The most severe contamination is noted in Brookside Village Mobile Home Park, surpassing both state and federal standards.
• Massachusetts: A substantial number of public water systems show PFAS levels higher than federal guidelines, with Eastern Massachusetts showing a higher concentration.
• Residents of New Jersey are among 89.3 million people nationwide who have drinking water that has tested positive for toxic “forever chemicals”.

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a directive to the U.S. Air Force and Arizona National Guard to address groundwater contamination in Tucson, Arizona, particularly near Tucson International Airport.

Groundwater near the airport is contaminated due to the presence of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), which have been found in dangerously high concentrations, significantly exceeding safety limits.

PFAS contamination poses serious public health risks due to its hazardous effects, including alterations in liver enzymes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and an increased risk of kidney and testicular cancer.

The contamination was traced back to military properties, prompting the EPA’s demand for a comprehensive cleanup.

Recent tests at the Tucson Airport Remediation Project (TARP) area revealed PFAS levels as high as 53,000 parts per trillion—over 5,000 times above the allowable threshold for drinking water, which ranges from 4 to 10 parts per trillion.

In response, the EPA has given the responsible military bases 60 days to devise a remediation plan to halt the further spread of these contaminants and to safeguard the city’s groundwater resources.

Tucson Water highlighted the financial and resource burdens this contamination imposes on the community, stressing the importance of groundwater as a critical, yet finite, resource for the city.

Additionally, the city has shifted the use of water from TARP to non-drinking purposes to support environmental restoration along the Santa Cruz River, reinforcing public confidence in the safety of Tucson’s drinking water.

The remediation efforts, as outlined by the EPA, will require significant technological interventions, possibly including the construction of new treatment facilities or the expansion of existing ones.

Technologies such as granular activated carbon filtration are being considered to effectively remove PFAS from the water, ensuring it meets health standards for future use as drinking water.

This directive comes against a backdrop of long-standing environmental challenges in the area, which involve a variety of pollutants that have contaminated soil and water due to historical defense and industrial activities.

If you or a loved one developed health problems related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

U.S. manufacturing and chemical industry groups, led by the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Chemistry Council, have filed a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Filed on June 11, 2024, the lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenges the EPA’s new rule that establishes the first-ever drinking water standards for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.”

PFAS chemicals are commonly used in numerous industries and products, including transformers for electric grids, components in clean energy technologies like semiconductors and solar panels, and aircraft and fire suppression systems.

The EPA’s regulation is projected to affect between 6% and 10% of the 66,000 public drinking water systems in the United States, impacting roughly 100 million people by reducing exposure to these harmful chemicals.

The National Association of Manufacturers and the American Chemistry Council argues that the EPA’s rule is “arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion” and assert that it exceeds the agency’s authority granted under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974.

The lawsuit follows closely on the heels of a similar challenge by two associations representing water utilities, which contend that the EPA’s rule does not rely on the best available science.

In 2023, litigation against chemical companies over PFAS contamination led to $11 billion in settlements

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

PFAS contamination in water is a nationwide concern.

Regulatory actions and developments have resulted in more and more communities testing their public drinking water sources for PFAS chemicals.

Recent news around the U.S. are:

• City Utilities (CU) in Springfield, Missouri, is suing 3M for PFAS contamination of the James River, alleging violations of the Clean Water Act due to the company’s Springfield plant operations.

The lawsuit addresses PFAS pollution in the city’s water sources, which exceeds new EPA regulatory limits, and claims 3M failed to adequately report PFAS levels despite measures to mitigate contamination.

• Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha has filed a lawsuit against several manufacturers including 3M and DuPont, for widespread PFAS contamination affecting the state’s natural resources and public health.

The lawsuit seeks damages for the extensive environmental and health impacts caused by PFAS, which have been found near military and industrial sites across Rhode Island.

• Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) filed a lawsuit against the EPA for failing to prevent PFAS contamination from treated sewage sludge used as fertilizer, which has led to widespread damage to farmland and community health.
• In Texas, farmers and ranchers have sued the EPA over its inadequate regulation of PFAS in biosolids, claiming significant damage to their land and livelihoods.
• The Portland Water District in Maine is suing 18 companies, including DuPont and 3M, to recover costs related to PFAS contamination in wastewater.

This lawsuit is part of a broader initiative, which includes plans for a new treatment facility projected to cost between $150 million and $250 million.

• The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association is considering suing the EPA for failing to regulate PFAS-contaminated sludge used as fertilizer, arguing that existing studies are sufficient for regulatory action and emphasizing the need for protective measures for farmers and communities.

These cases highlight ongoing legal and environmental challenges related to PFAS contamination and the efforts by communities and states to hold corporations and regulatory bodies accountable.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

Recent findings from environmental testing in the state of Washington reveal concerning levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination in private wells, particularly in the West Plains area near Spokane.

PFAS contamination is a significant concern to public health due to its hazardous health effects, such as changes in liver enzymes, Pregnancy-induced hypertension, and Kidney and testicular cancer.

This data prompted the West Plains Water Coalition to organize a public event slated for June 3, 2024, aimed at discussing the latest updates on PFAS contamination and its link to a potential cancer cluster in the region.

In 2017, Fairchild Air Force Base disclosed the presence of PFAS—often called “forever chemicals” due to their persistent nature—in the local water supplies of Airway Heights, Medical Lake, and nearby areas.

Despite efforts over the years, the contamination remains unresolved, compelling the city of Airway Heights to procure clean drinking water from Spokane’s different aquifer.

The event will feature key speakers such as Jennifer Sabel, Manager of the Environmental Epidemiology Section, who will present findings from a cancer cluster analysis related to PFAS exposure.

The state initiated tests in March on hundreds of private wells, revealing that over half contain PFAS levels exceeding Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, you may be eligible to take legal action. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

State and federal lawmakers are looking to push more stringent regulations on the use and environmental impact of PFAS chemicals.

PFAS contamination is a significant concern in environmental and public health due to its hazardous health effects, such as increases in cholesterol levels, Lower antibody response to some vaccines, Changes in liver enzymes, Pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia, and Kidney and testicular cancer.

The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association (MOFGA) is pursuing legal action to push for federal regulation of sewage sludge used in agriculture after PFAS contamination was found on a local dairy farm.

This contamination traces back to sludge applied over a decade ago, prompting Maine to tighten its regulations.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been criticized for its slow response to PFAS risks and plans only to assess the risks of two PFAS compounds this year.

This has been seen as insufficient by advocacy groups due to the EPA’s historical reluctance to enforce stricter sludge regulations.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court is set to review the EPA’s new regulations on PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals.”

These regulations impact 6% to 10% of the U.S.’s 66,000 public drinking water systems.

The current lawsuit argues that these regulations are too vague, providing no clear standards for permissible PFAS levels, leading to uncertainty about compliance among water providers.

PFAS in consumer products is also a glaring issue.

Some consumer products that have been recently found to contain PFAS include the following:

• PFAS were detected in some store-bought milk from tests on 50 samples across five states, revealing traces of harmful chemicals that lack federal regulatory guidelines in food
• BIC Inc. faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly failing to disclose the presence of PFAS, known as “forever chemicals,” in the lubricated strips of some of their razors, the lawsuit cites fraud and negligence
• PFASs are also known to be found in food packaging and other food contact articles (FCAs) used in the production, processing, transport, handling, and storage of foods

Our law firm is currently focused on personal injury claims related to water contamination from PFAS, specifically in areas close to military bases and other similar operations.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to get in touch with our PFAS Lawyers.

The investigation into health effects and environmental contamination from PFAS chemicals is ongoing. 

Documents obtained from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggest the agency may have provided false information about harmful contaminants in pesticides, according to allegations from a coalition and a former EPA researcher.

The claims follow a May 2023 press release in which the EPA stated it found no per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in certain insecticides.

This statement contradicted a study by the former EPA researcher that identified PFAS in the same products.

PFAS contamination is a significant concern in environmental and public health due to its hazardous effects, accurate testing for PFAS is critical for regulating exposure.

The group, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), obtained pesticide testing data from the EPA through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

These documents revealed that the EPA found PFAS in the tested products, contradicting its earlier public statement.

The study found perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), a type of PFAS, in six out of 10 insecticides used in agriculture.

The EPA, declining to comment on the pending formal complaint process, previously stated its commitment to addressing PFAS contamination, having recently finalized drinking water limits for PFAS and classifying certain types as hazardous substances.

The EPA’s internal documents, however, revealed that the agency had conducted four tests on pesticide samples but publicly disclosed only two.

One of the undisclosed tests detected PFAS.

The controversy raises questions about the integrity of the EPA’s testing methods and the influence of external pressures on its scientific reporting.

The group accuses the EPA of scientific and ethical misconduct.

Additionally, the EPA could soon face a lawsuit for not protecting farmers from “forever chemicals.”

Farmers in the Northeast are pushing the EPA to set federal standards for PFAS levels in biosolids, a fertilizer byproduct of treated sewage known to contain these harmful chemicals.

With state regulations on PFAS scarce, the Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association argues that individual state actions are insufficient to tackle widespread contamination, urging for immediate federal intervention to ensure biosolid safety.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a lawsuit instantly.

Our lawyers are investigating PFAS cases across the country. 

The New York Times has reported that the plastics industry expects an impending flood of litigation concerning per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), potentially surpassing the scope of asbestos-related cases.

During a conference for major plastic manufacturers earlier this year, industry executives were warned to brace for legal challenges that could involve “astronomical” financial repercussions.

According to the New York Times report, industry attorneys highlighted the urgency of reviewing corporate communications and preparing robust legal defenses in anticipation of widespread claims.

PFAS, often referred to as ‘forever chemicals’ due to their persistent nature in the environment, have been utilized for decades in various consumer products like cosmetics, cookware, firefighting foams, and more.

PFAS chemicals are now linked to significant health risks, including cancer and liver disease, and have been found in the blood of nearly all Americans.

The federal government has recently taken steps to mitigate PFAS risks, mandating the removal of certain types from drinking water and designating them as hazardous substances under the Superfund law.

This shift in the regulatory landscape is likely to further lawsuits from water utilities and communities seeking to recover purification costs and damages.

Legal experts compare the potential scale of PFAS litigation to historical public health lawsuits, with predictions that it could ultimately exceed the combined impacts of past litigation related to tobacco, asbestos, and MTBE—a harmful gasoline additive.

This escalation arrives as manufacturers, including major entities like DuPont and 3M, face increasing pressure over their roles in PFAS production and pollution.

Our law firm is currently investigating cases of PFAS contamination and resulting health conditions in exposed populations.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly.

PFAS Lawsuits concerning the contamination of local water supplies are ongoing, and personal injury claims for exposure to PFAS-containing firefighting foam are progressing in multidistrict litigation (MDL). 

BASF, a German chemical company, has agreed to a $316.5 million settlement with several U.S. public water systems over claims that its firefighting foam contaminated water supplies with toxic PFAS chemicals.

BASF is among nearly two dozen chemical companies that have faced lawsuits brought by water systems over PFAS pollution in sprawling litigation that has been centralized in a South Carolina federal court.

PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals” because they do not break down easily in nature or the human body, are linked to several health issues, including cancer.

PFAS chemicals are found in a wide range of products, such as firefighting foams, non-stick cookware, and stain-resistant materials.

Under the terms of the settlement, BASF will pay an initial $4 million in July and an additional $312.5 million in March 2025.

BASF has stated that this settlement does not imply any admission of liability or wrongdoing and plans to seek reimbursement through its insurance policies.

This settlement comes amidst ongoing extensive litigation involving nearly two dozen chemical manufacturers in a federal court in South Carolina, focusing on both groundwater contamination from PFAS and direct exposure to AFFF.

In 2023, similar lawsuits resulted in over $11 billion in settlements between U.S. water systems and major chemical companies, including 3M, Chemours, Corteva, DuPont de Nemours, and Johnson Controls.

In addition to legal actions, PFAS chemicals have increasingly been the subject of stringent regulatory measures in the U.S., with the Environmental Protection Agency recently establishing national drinking water standards and designating certain PFAS compounds as hazardous under the Superfund program.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, contact us for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit immediately.

The PFAS Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Decades ago, Hansen, a chemist at 3M, discovered PFAS in human blood samples, a finding that contradicted claims of safety made by her superiors and 3M’s external presentations.

3M, a conglomerate known for products like Scotch Tape and Post-it notes, is now facing backlash for its handling of PFAS, which are components in products such as Scotchgard and Scotchban.

The internal conflict began in 1997 when Hansen was tasked by her supervisor to validate external lab findings that unexpectedly detected PFAS in general population blood samples.

Hansen and her team ultimately found PFOS in eagles, chickens, rabbits, cows, pigs, and other animals, they also found 14 ­additional fluorochemicals in human blood, including several produced by 3M, and some were present in wastewater from a 3M factory.

Hansen’s confirmation of these findings led to a suppression of her work and a series of corporate maneuvers that kept these toxicological risks hidden from the public and regulatory bodies.

Despite internal studies from decades prior that showed the toxicity of PFAS, 3M continued to produce and promote these chemicals.

It wasn’t until the late 1990s that 3M disclosed to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that PFAS was indeed widespread in blood samples across the U.S.

However, the company downplayed the potential risks.

Legal consequences for 3M have escalated as the understanding of PFAS’s environmental and health impacts has grown.

Regulatory pressures and litigation risks have prompted 3M to announce a planned phase-out of PFAS manufacturing by 2025.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly.

The PFAS lawsuit is ongoing. 

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are notorious environmental contaminants, often found in water supplies across various regions.

These chemicals stem from several sources, including industrial facilities, fire-fighting foams, and consumer products like textiles and furnishing.

PFAS are persistent in the environment and can accumulate in water systems through multiple pathways such as industrial discharges, atmospheric deposition, and leaching from soil.

Recent research has highlighted the significant role of atmospheric deposition in contaminating the Great Lakes with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances).

This study indicates that PFAS, due to their persistence and ability to travel long distances, are found in varying concentrations across the lakes.

PFAS contamination is human-made, not natural.

These chemicals have been widely used in various industrial applications and consumer products, such as firefighting foams, non-stick cookware, water-repellent fabrics, and more.

Their presence in the environment results from both direct discharges and atmospheric deposition, leading to widespread contamination, including in aquatic systems like the Great Lakes.

Our lawyers are actively addressing PFAS contamination throughout the nation.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries related to PFAS contamination, call us today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a PFAS Contamination Lawsuit instantly. 

San Francisco is on the brink of becoming the first city in the United States to ban firefighter clothing manufactured with PFAS.

Local lawmakers are expected to pass an ordinance prohibiting the use of protective equipment made with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

The Environmental Protection Agency states that PFAS can be ingested or absorbed through the skin, posing significant health risks, including higher cancer rates, decreased fertility, and developmental delays in children.

PFAS were traditionally used in nonstick, fire-proof, and stain-resistant products but have been largely phased out of U.S. manufacturing, except in firefighting foam and firefighter uniforms.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously supported the ban last week, and a final vote is anticipated soon.

Once enacted, the law will mandate that the city’s fire department purchase PFAS-free protective clothing for over 1,400 firefighters by June 30, 2026.

The exact exposure levels of PFAS in firefighter uniforms remain under study, but firefighting is already classified as carcinogenic by the World Health Organization due to other hazardous exposures.

The San Francisco Fire Department has lost over 300 firefighters to cancer in the past 20 years.

New PFAS-free turnouts are being tested by 11 San Francisco firefighters as part of a national trial by the International Association of Fire Fighters.

The estimated cost for PFAS-free turnout gear is $3,400 per set, totaling $10.1 million for the city, a cost deemed justified compared to the health and lives of firefighters.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated two chemicals, PFOA and PFOS, part of the broader PFAS category, as hazardous substances under the Superfund law on April 19, 2024.

This designation requires immediate reporting of these chemicals when released into the environment and enables the EPA to mandate cleanups to protect public health while ensuring guilty parties bear the cleanup costs.

Historically, PFOA and PFOS have been used in a range of consumer products and industrial applications, including nonstick cookware and firefighting foams.

The Superfund status does not impose a ban on PFOA and PFOS but facilitates more rigorous and swift cleanup and cost recovery.

This measure follows a broader regulatory trend, including recent EPA limits on PFAS in drinking water, aimed at significantly reducing public exposure and preventing associated health risks.

The American Chemistry Council has criticized the Superfund designation, arguing it could complicate effective remediation due to the complexity and cost.

Despite this, recent settlements, including a $1.18 billion agreement by major chemical manufacturers to address PFAS contamination in drinking water, indicate a shift towards accountability for historical pollution.

Although U.S. production has ceased, these compounds remain environmentally persistent, posing significant health risks, such as cancer and liver damage.

This regulatory action aligns with findings from the National Academies of Science, emphasizing the severe health impacts of PFAS and advocating for stronger measures to manage pollution.

The EPA’s enforcement strategy will target major contributors to PFAS pollution, exempting entities like local fire departments and water utilities.

The designation represents a significant advancement in environmental regulation, prioritizing public health and holding persistent polluters accountable.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established the first national limits on perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water.

These regulations target six specific types of PFAS, commonly referred to as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and

This is one of the most significant regulatory measures aimed at curbing the widespread environmental and health risks associated with PFAS.

According to the new guidelines, the levels of two prevalent PFAS types (PFOA and PFOS) are capped at 4 parts per trillion in public drinking water systems, and an additional three chemicals—PFNA, PFHxS, and GenX—have been set to a limit of 10 parts per trillion.

PFAS have been extensively used in products like nonstick cookware and firefighting foam, leading to their persistence in the environment and potential health implications for the public.

Despite being largely phased out, PFAS’ enduring presence in ecosystems continues to pose severe health risks, evidenced by the high prevalence of PFAS in the bloodstreams of most Americans.

The EPA’s actions are projected to necessitate modifications in 4,100 to 6,700 public water systems across the country, which serve approximately 100 million people.

These systems are mandated to initiate PFAS monitoring within three years and, if necessary, implement technological upgrades to comply with the new standards within the subsequent two years.

Numerous public water systems have pursued litigation against PFAS manufacturers, seeking to recover costs associated with mitigating these chemicals’ impacts.

These lawsuits have led to substantial settlements, including a recent $1.18 billion agreement benefitting 300 water providers nationwide.

The EPA’s initiative, backed by $1 billion in federal funding for state and territorial PFAS management, signals a federal commitment to addressing and remediating the pervasive issue of PFAS contamination.

While this regulatory step is monumental, it addresses only a fraction of the over 12,000 known PFAS types, indicating that the path toward comprehensive management of these chemicals will take time.

If you’ve been exposed to PFAS and developed related health problems, you may be eligible to file a claim. 

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation.

Recent testing has revealed the presence of PFAS, known as forever chemicals, in bandages from major brands including Band-Aid and Curad.

These chemicals, linked to numerous health risks including cancer, were found in 65 percent of bandages tested, with some containing over 180 parts per million organic fluorine.

Scientific research has shown that PFAS can enter the bloodstream after a person drinks water or eats food laced with the chemical, and once in the bloodstream, PFAS can accumulate within healthy tissue, potentially causing damage to the immune system, liver, kidneys, and other organs.

The discovery of PFAS in bandages raises concerns about the use of forever chemicals in consumer products, and calls for the industry to seek PFAS-free alternatives.

​​If you or a loved one have developed health problems related to PFAS exposure, you may be eligible for legal action. 

Contact our law firm to learn more about PFAS Exposure Lawsuits, AFFF Lawsuits, and other legal actions for exposure to forever chemicals. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

3M has agreed to a multi-billion-dollar settlement over the contamination of U.S. public drinking water systems with PFAS, known as “forever chemicals.”

A federal court gave final approval to the settlement, with a total payment ranging between $10.5 billion and $12.5 billion to be distributed between about 300 communities impacted by PFAS contamination.

This settlement follows an $850 million agreement with the State of Minnesota in 2018 for water and environmental contamination.

PFAS, used in various consumer products for their nonstick and resistant properties, have been linked to health issues including liver damage, immune system diseases, and cancer.

The settlement will compensate water providers for PFAS pollution, fund water system contaminant filtration, and support additional systems in testing for PFAS.

Some of the settlement money will help additional water systems test for contamination from PFAS.

If you or a loved one is suffering from the negative effects of PFAS contamination, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation.

New data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revealed that over 70 million Americans consume water from systems contaminated with toxic PFAS chemicals.

The EPA’s ongoing five-year survey of water systems indicates this number is likely to increase with quarterly updates.

Per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals” due to their resistance to degradation, pose significant health risks, including cancer, even at minimal exposure levels.

These substances are prevalent in various products and industries, accumulating in the environment and human bodies.

PFAS are called “forever chemicals” as they accumulate in the environment without breaking down, causing them to be an ongoing environmental concern.

Major cities like Salt Lake City, Sacramento, Madison (WI), and Louisville have reported PFAS contamination.

The EPA’s analysis found 1,245 of approximately 3,800 water systems tested contain PFAS levels above the agency’s reported thresholds.

The EPA plans to extend this testing to include major systems like those in Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, and Philadelphia by 2026.

Currently, the U.S. lacks enforceable national drinking water standards for PFAS, but the EPA has proposed the first-ever standards for six specific PFAS production methods or uses,

Communities across the US face the challenge of eliminating these contaminants to safeguard public health.

The upcoming EPA regulations may shift enforcement focus towards primary polluters, yet many water utilities might struggle with the financial and technical demands of implementing advanced treatment systems.

Cities like Sacramento and Salt Lake City express concerns about adapting to these regulations amidst varying climate conditions and water source availability.

For example, Sacramento’s reliance on river and groundwater sources complicates treatment processes, especially with state guidelines already creating a need for the shutdown of certain groundwater sources due to PFAS contamination.

Similarly, Salt Lake City’s dependance on surface and groundwater resources, crucial during droughts, faces threats from PFAS pollution, emphasizing the significant impact on water scarcity in the western United States.

Individuals exposed to PFAS can face various health issues, including:

• Cancer
• Immune System Effects
• Thyroid Disease
• Reproductive Issues
• Developmental Effects
• Cholesterol Levels
• Liver Damage

If you or a loved one is suffering from the negative effects of PFAS contamination, contact TorHoerman Law today for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free consultation. 

UN experts stated that American chemical companies DuPont and Chemours have released toxic PFAS into the environment near the lower Cape Fear River in North Carolina, disregarding resident’s rights and health.

These “forever chemicals”, found in personal care products, plastics, and other items, persist in nature for long periods of time and can bioaccumulate in humans posing significant health risks.

Experts criticized DuPont and Chemours for knowingly producing and profiting from PFAS despite being aware of its harmful effects.

They urged the UN Environment Assembly to address the global issue of PFAS contamination.

Additionally, experts raised concerns about the export of PFAS-hazardous waste from The Netherlands to the United States, pointing to a violation of international law.

Dupont and Chemours were also accused of influencing the US Environmental Protection Agency to delay regulation of PFAS, impacting affected communities’ right to information and remedy.

The experts expressed alarm over reports of Chemours seeking an air permit to expand PFAS production in North Carolina and criticized the companies for spreading misinformation about PFAS benefits in decarbonization efforts.

Individuals affected by PFAS contamination have the right to seek legal action against DuPont and Chemours.

If you or someone you know has been affected by PFAS contamination, it’s crucial to seek legal assistance and hold these companies accountable. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, don’t hesitate to take action to protect your rights and health.