A new Roundup trial commenced this week in Philadelphia, marking the fifth Roundup case to be heard in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.

Plaintiffs are aiming to secure their fourth victory out of five trials in this venue.

The trial is particularly significant as it follows a previous loss in Philadelphia, which plaintiffs attribute to an evidentiary ruling that excluded key evidence, including a study from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) linking glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, to cancer.

Judge Roberts, who is presiding over the current trial, has reconsidered his earlier decision and will now allow the plaintiffs to present the IARC study as evidence.

This ruling is expected to play a pivotal role in the trial, potentially influencing the outcome in favor of the plaintiffs.

The trial’s proceedings are being closely watched, given the broader implications for ongoing and future Roundup lawsuits, where the admissibility of scientific evidence remains a contentious issue.

The trial is expected to conclude in the coming weeks.

If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

Bayer recently won a significant legal decision in the Third Circuit Court, which ruled that federal regulations on pesticide labeling take precedence over state laws.

Pesticide labeling refers to the information provided on the packaging of pesticide products, which includes instructions on how to use the product safely and effectively.

The label typically includes details like the ingredients, health and environmental warnings, proper application methods, storage and disposal instructions, and first aid measures.

This decision is particularly important because it involves the widely used herbicide Roundup, which has been the subject of numerous lawsuits claiming it causes cancer.

The case arose in Pennsylvania, where state laws could have required cancer warnings on Roundup labels.

However, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had already reviewed the scientific evidence and decided not to include a cancer warning on the Roundup label.

The court ruled that because the EPA had approved the label without a cancer warning, state laws demanding such warnings are overridden by federal law.

This ruling strengthens Bayer’s legal position in defending Roundup against similar claims.

Although there are differing opinions in other federal courts about whether state or federal regulations should be the final authority.

The ruling has caused Bayer’s stock to rise by 10%, reflecting investor confidence in the outcome.

However, this issue might not be settled entirely, as the disagreement among courts increases the chance that it could eventually be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

For now, though, Bayer has won a crucial battle in its ongoing legal challenges related to Roundup.

Despite this, lawsuits are still being filed against Monsanto (Bayer) by individuals who claim that exposure to Roundup caused their cancer.

If you or a loved one developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or another type of cancer due to Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.

The Attorneys General of Iowa and Nebraska are advocating for a national standard for glyphosate labels, urging the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a rule that would prevent states from mandating labels falsely claiming that glyphosate causes cancer.

This push comes amid ongoing litigation and controversy surrounding the safety of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, a widely used herbicide.

Kevin Ross, a former president of the National Corn Growers Association, supports the call for a national standard, arguing that it would eliminate misleading labels and create uniformity across states.

He pointed out that California, in particular, has implemented laws that impact agriculture in other states, creating a patchwork of regulations that complicate compliance for farmers and producers.

In addition to Iowa and Nebraska, nine other states have joined the petition, including Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, South Carolina, and South Dakota. 

The ongoing debate over glyphosate’s safety has led to numerous lawsuits against Bayer, the manufacturer of Roundup, with plaintiffs claiming that exposure to the herbicide caused cancer.

If you or a loved one suffered health problems resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.

The Roundup Lawsuit focuses on claims against Monsanto regarding the herbicide Roundup, which contains glyphosate.

Plaintiffs allege that glyphosate exposure leads to serious health conditions, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

In July, there were 4,305 filings in the Roundup lawsuit.

By August, this number slightly increased to 4,311 filings.

The consistent number of new filings indicates ongoing concerns and awareness regarding the health risks posed by glyphosate in Roundup.

Glyphosate, a key ingredient in Roundup, has been linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Research suggests that glyphosate disrupts cellular processes, leading to the development of cancerous cells.

This has prompted many affected individuals to seek legal action against Monsanto, contributing to the steady stream of lawsuit filings.

If you or a loved one suffered health problems resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing. 

A comprehensive study published in Frontiers in Cancer Control and Society has established a significant link between agricultural pesticide use and increased cancer risk across various types.

The study used county-level data to analyze pesticide usage patterns and their correlation with cancer incidence.

The study found strong associations between pesticide exposure and cancers such as leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, bladder, colon, lung, and pancreatic cancers.

Glyphosate, commonly known as Roundup, was frequently identified as a significant contributor to increased cancer risks, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Other pesticides like Atrazine, Boscalid, and Dicamba were also linked to higher incidences of various cancers.

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, has been classified as a probable carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

The study emphasizes the need for more stringent regulations and policies to manage pesticide use to mitigate cancer risks.

It also calls for greater public awareness and healthcare initiatives to address the risks associated with pesticide exposure, particularly in heavily agricultural regions.

There have been numerous lawsuits against Monsanto, the maker of Roundup, with plaintiffs claiming that glyphosate exposure led to their cancer diagnoses.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

A newly published study reveals that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup, is present in human sperm.

Conducted at a French infertility clinic, the study found that over 55 percent of sperm samples contained high levels of glyphosate.

The recent study, published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, examined 128 men from an area in France known for heavy Roundup use, particularly in grain and wine production.

Researchers warn that this could contribute to infertility, damage DNA in sperm, and cause health issues in offspring.

The study aligns with broader concerns about declining global fertility rates.

A 2020 Lancet analysis highlighted that exposure to toxic chemicals like glyphosate may significantly drive this decline.

Researchers tested blood and semen samples, finding glyphosate in the seminal plasma of 73 men.

Levels in semen were nearly four times higher than in blood.

The study indicated a positive correlation between glyphosate and oxidative stress, which damages cells and can lead to infertility.

Glyphosate appears to disrupt the Blood-Testis Barrier, leading to increased production of anti-sperm antibodies and autoimmune responses, further contributing to male infertility.

The study’s lead researcher, Claudine Vasseur, suggested that glyphosate negatively impacts human reproductive health and could affect progeny.

Despite the EPA’s stance that glyphosate does not cause cancer, thousands of lawsuits and settlements are still being actively filed.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

You can also use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify to file a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

In a recent multidistrict litigation (MDL) filing, parties requested the court to initiate the wind-down process for the Roundup MDL.

The proposal includes advancing the final wave of cases, designated as wave 9, with no additional waves for case workup and expert reports.

While defendants support continuing the mediation, plaintiffs advocate for a new process, citing inadequate settlement offers.

Currently, less than 2% of cases remain in the MDL, with litigation predominantly transitioning to state courts in Missouri, Pennsylvania, and other jurisdictions.

Despite low new MDL filings, approximately 40,000 cases are pending in Missouri courts.

The MDL court is expected to begin winding down the main Roundup litigation, potentially closing it by 2025. 

The overall impact of these efforts on Roundup litigation is minimal, as plaintiffs have identified jurisdictions such as California, Missouri, and Pennsylvania, which allow for mass consolidated actions.

Cases are progressing towards trial in these venues, with several jury verdicts anticipated before the end of 2024.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing and our Roundup lawyers are accepting new cases. 

An Oregon appeals court overturned a trial victory for Monsanto owner Bayer AG.

The court found the trial judge improperly barred key evidence about the EPA, which could have swayed the jury in favor of the plaintiff, Larry Johnson, who claims long-term Roundup use caused his non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

The court rejected Monsanto’s argument that EPA approval preempts state law claims.

This decision aligns with other courts’ rejections of Monsanto’s “preemption” defense.

Excluding testimony from Charles Benbrook, a critic of the EPA’s handling of glyphosate herbicides, was deemed a significant error.

His testimony would have clarified the regulatory framework and EPA oversight.

The ruling means Monsanto may face a new trial with the previously excluded evidence.

This could affect the outcomes of over 100,000 similar lawsuits alleging Roundup causes cancer.

Bayer AG can request reconsideration by the appellate court or seek review by the Oregon Supreme Court.

If unsuccessful, the case will proceed to a new trial.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

The Roundup lawsuit is ongoing and our lawyers are continuing to accept cases. 

The Roundup lawsuit involves claims related to the herbicide Roundup, which contains the toxic chemical glyphosate linked to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

In June, there were 4,285 Roundup lawsuit filings.

By July, this number increased to 4,305, reflecting ongoing concerns about glyphosate.

Glyphosate in Roundup causes lymphoma by disrupting cellular processes.

Many exposed individuals have developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leading to more Roundup lawsuit filings.

The Roundup lawsuit seeks to hold the manufacturer accountable for glyphosate-related harm.

Affected individuals should consult a Roundup lawsuit lawyer.

If you or a loved one suffered injuries resulting from Roundup weed killer exposure, you may qualify to participate in a Roundup lawsuit.

Contact an experienced Roundup lawyer to discuss your legal options today, free of charge and no obligation required.

Bayer has intensified its lobbying efforts in Congress to introduce legislation that could shield the company from thousands of lawsuits which claim that Roundup causes cancer.

This initiative aims to mitigate Bayer’s financial exposure and prevent substantial payouts to plaintiffs.

Central to this campaign is the Roundup’s primary ingredient, glyphosate, which several health authorities classify as a carcinogen.

Bayer’s lobbying targets the upcoming farm bill, a comprehensive piece of legislation essential for federal agriculture and nutrition programs.

If Bayer’s efforts are successful, lawsuits alleging Roundup’s health risks could be prevented, protecting Bayer from future liabilities.

The Roundup Lawsuits claim that users were not adequately warned about the potential health risks linked to Roundup exposure, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Bayer maintains the safety of Roundup, but the company already settled thousands of cases for around $10 billion in 2020 and is facing thousands more cases yet to be resolved.

Bayer’s acquisition of Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion included inheriting Roundup Lawsuits, significantly impacting its finances.

The company has faced approximately 170,000 claims, some with substantial settlement awards. 

The outcome of these legislative efforts holds significant implications for future claims and regulatory practices concerning pesticide safety.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing. 

A study published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety revealed glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, is present in human sperm at levels higher than typically found in blood.

French researchers warn that glyphosate could damage the blood test barrier, leading to infertility and DNA damage that might affect future generations.

This finding raises concerns about the widespread use of Roundup in agriculture and residential settings.

The CDC found that 80% of Americans tested positive for glyphosate.

Glyphosate has faced scrutiny since the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified it as a probable carcinogen in 2015.

This classification led to numerous global restrictions on Roundup, driven by concerns over increased risks of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers.

Additionally, a report from Salon highlighted that 98% of adolescents in Pedro Moncayo, Ecuador, had high concentrations of glyphosate in their urine, with links to neurobehavioral issues.

These findings suggest glyphosate could have long-term effects on human reproductive health, necessitating a precautionary approach to its use.

Bayer and its subsidiary Monsanto have faced over 100,000 lawsuits from users claiming exposure to Roundup caused their cancer.

Despite paying over $10 billion in settlements, Bayer continues to face thousands more Roundup Lawsuits in the U.S. court system.

In 2023, Bayer committed to replacing glyphosate-based products in the U.S. residential market with formulations using alternative ingredients.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Bayer AG is intensifying its efforts to establish a legal safeguard against ongoing lawsuits that allege its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer and other serious health effects.

Roundup is used widely by farmers to manage weeds, reduce tilling, and prevent soil erosion.

Despite disputing claims that glyphosate causes cancer, Bayer has faced approximately 170,000 lawsuits and has allocated $16 billion for settlements.

The company asserts that continuing the legal battle is unsustainable and is seeking legislative relief.

The legislation Bayer supports would shield pesticide manufacturers from cancer-related claims if their product labeling complies with EPA standards.

This move has sparked debate among lawmakers, with some expressing concerns about the implications for farmer alternatives and Bayer’s potential withdrawal from the U.S. market.

Bayer has pushed for laws in Missouri, Iowa, and Idaho that would prevent plaintiffs from claiming that the company failed to warn about cancer risks associated with Roundup.

Although legislation progressed in Iowa and Missouri, it ultimately did not pass in any of the states.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

A Philadelphia court has reduced the payout that Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, must provide in damages related to a lawsuit from $2.25 billion to $400 million.

This decision decreases the company’s financial burden by approximately 82%, or nearly $1.9 billion.

The court ruled that Monsanto is now ordered to pay $350 million in punitive damages and a little over $50 million in compensatory damages, although the original ruling earlier this year had mandated a considerably higher sum.

The decision for reduction comes amidst Monsanto’s plans to appeal the liability verdict in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

The case centers around claims from a plaintiff who alleges that his cancer was caused by exposure to Roundup, a herbicide that contains glyphosate.

Glyphosate has been reported to increase the risk of cancer and other serious health issues.

Glyphosate was reclassified in 2015 as ‘probably carcinogenic’ by the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC).

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly. 

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing. 

The multidistrict litigation concerning Roundup, Monsanto’s widely used herbicide, has grown from 4,279 to 4,285 pending cases in the past month, according to the latest JPML filings.

Plaintiffs, predominantly farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners, allege that prolonged exposure to glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, has led to serious health issues, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Monsanto, a subsidiary of Bayer AG, faces increasing scrutiny as these legal challenges escalate.

Plaintiffs are urged to seek legal advice to understand their options and possibly hold responsible parties accountable.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly. 

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing. 

Bayer AG is escalating its legal defense as it faces a mounting number of lawsuits alleging that its Roundup weedkiller causes cancer.

The chemical giant, which firmly disputes these cancer claims, has encountered approximately 170,000 legal actions related to Roundup and has allocated $16 billion to settle these cases.

The CEO reported that the chemical conglomerate is spending more on lawsuits than the $2.6 billion annually allocated to R&D, stating that continuing the legal battle in its current form is unsustainable.

In an effort to establish a legal buffer, Bayer lobbied for legislation this year in Missouri, Iowa, and Idaho that would prevent claims that the company failed to warn about cancer risks if their products adhere to existing EPA regulations.

Bayer’s plan includes a renewed push in upcoming legislative sessions and potentially expanding efforts to other states.

The company faces significant internal changes as well, having reduced its global workforce by over 1,500 employees, with additional layoffs forthcoming at its Iowa facility, which Bayer attributes to broader restructuring rather than the legislative setbacks alone.

Additionally, Bayer is reinforcing its stance by supporting legislation aimed at protection, especially in Missouri—the location of the original manufacturer of Roundup, Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in 2018.

Legal experts indicate that while new legislation may not affect existing lawsuits, it could curtail future claims.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

The Missouri Senate faces significant contention over proposed legislation designed to protect pesticide manufacturers from litigation alleging their products cause cancer.

Specifically targeting Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, the bill would shield Bayer, Roundup’s manufacturer, from failure to warn lawsuits if their products carry labels approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Despite clearance in the House, the bill’s progress in the Senate remains uncertain due to a deadlock particularly caused by a filibuster.

Bayer advocates for the bill, arguing that glyphosate is unlikely to cause cancer in humans.

The legislation asserts that adherence to EPA’s labeling guidelines fulfills Bayer’s duty to warn consumers, providing substantial legal protection against claims.

Conversely, opposition from a team including the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys and the Missouri Freedom Caucus GOP members highlight concerns over prioritizing corporate interests above public health.

Critics argue that the bill would restrict Missourians’ rights to pursue legal action for health damages such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which some attribute exposure to glyphosate-based pesticides like Roundup.

The financial stakes for Bayer are high, having already moved approximately $16 billion towards handling Roundup Lawsuits, including over $10 billion paid out in settlements and jury verdicts.

The proposed legislation follows several legal defeats for Bayer, with recent jury awards reaching billions in favor of plaintiffs.

The legislative outcome could dramatically influence both future litigation and the availability of Roundup nationwide.

Missouri farm groups have backed the pesticide labeling legislation, saying farmers need assurance Roundup will be available for the long term.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us today for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing.

A total of 4,279 lawsuits are pending in the multidistrict litigation established for plaintiffs claiming that exposure to Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, caused them to develop non-hodgkin’s lymphoma and other health problems.

Roundup Lawsuit plaintiffs are commonly individuals such as farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners, who claim that long-term exposure to glyphosate has adversely affected their health.

Bayer is pushing for state legislation that would protect it from lawsuits claiming that Roundup causes cancer, arguing that compliance with U.S. EPA regulations should offer legal immunity.

This move has sparked controversy, with opponents arguing it could shield companies from accountability for not fully informing consumers about potential risks.

If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup and subsequently developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other related cancers, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit instantly. 

Bayer, the manufacturer of the widely-used weedkiller Roundup, is actively lobbying for legislation in Iowa, Missouri, and Idaho that would shield it from lawsuits alleging that Roundup causes cancer.

The proposed bills, which have been influenced directly by Bayer, aim to grant pesticide companies immunity from claims if their product labels comply with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards, despite ongoing disputes about the safety of these products.

Legal experts suggest that the involvement of such legislation could be far-reaching, potentially affecting all product liability claims and, in Iowa, potentially granting immunity from all lawsuits.

The concern is that this could set a precedent that potentially could be adopted by other states.

Critics of the legislation argue that it undermines government accountability and consumer safety.

Bayer defends the legislative push as a necessity to manage the defense of a product they assert is safe when used as directed.

The company has faced about 167,000 legal claims tying Roundup to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a type of cancer, resulting in substantial financial settlements and several court losses.

Bayer contends that the EPA has consistently found glyphosate, Roundup’s active ingredient, unlikely to cause cancer, a stance supported by many global regulatory bodies.

The debate over glyphosate escalated when a 2015 report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the World Health Organization, said it’s “probably carcinogenic to humans” based on “limited” evidence of cancer in people and “sufficient” evidence in study animals.

The legislative outcomes vary: it has passed the Iowa Senate, is pending in the Missouri House, and was defeated in Idaho.

The defeat in Idaho reflects broader concerns about over-reliance on federal safety standards and restricting individuals’ rights to seek compensation through legal action.

This legislative effort by Bayer raises critical questions about the balance between protecting business interests and ensuring consumer safety, especially given precedents where substances initially deemed safe are later proved harmful.

Our law firm is still accepting clients for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

Contact us for a free consultation, or use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

Bayer is currently seeking legal protections in Iowa, Missouri, and Idaho to shield itself from future lawsuits claiming that its herbicide, Roundup, causes cancer.

The proposed legislation in these states would exempt pesticide companies from claims about failing to warn users of cancer risks if their product labeling complies with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations.

Despite this, critics argue that such laws could inhibit product liability claims, potentially setting a precedent nationwide.

The legislation has passed in the Iowa Senate and awaits debate in the Missouri House, while it was defeated in Idaho.

The company has faced about 167,000 claims linking Roundup to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leading to settlements and judgments costing approximately $10 billion.

Experts and critics of the legislation express concerns about its implications for consumer safety and legal rights.

The legislation’s potential to prevent lawsuits beyond product liability is highlighted by experts who warn of its extensive reach, potentially impacting various types of legal claims.

This legislative push by Bayer underscores the company’s ongoing battle over the safety and labeling of Roundup.

The outcome of these legislative efforts could significantly influence future litigation and regulatory approaches to product safety and corporate liability.

A Missouri judge reduced a $1.56 billion verdict against Bayer to $611 million.

A Cole County jury determined Monsanto liable in November, citing negligence, design defects, and a failure to warn about the product’s risks adequately.

The jury awarded $61.1 million in compensatory damages and $1.5 billion in punitive damages, the latter divided equally among the plaintiffs.

On March 15, the Judge adjusted the punitive damages to $549.9 million, in line with the U.S. Supreme Court’s guidance.

Bayer contests the revised verdict, planning to appeal both the damages and the initial liability ruling.

The company maintains that extensive scientific studies demonstrate the safety of Roundup and its active ingredient, glyphosate.

The plaintiff’s lawyers supported the court’s adjustment, labeling it “unassailably constitutional” and reflective of Monsanto’s “willful, malicious, and reckless disregard” for consumer safety.

This ruling is part of a broader legal battle Bayer has been waging since it acquired Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion.

Despite agreeing to a $10.9 billion settlement for a large portion of the claims in 2020, about 113,000 of the 167,000 cases have been resolved, with the rest continuing to press forward.

Bayer has achieved more successes in recent trials, but the plaintiffs have secured over $4 billion in verdicts, including a $2.25 billion verdict in January, which Bayer is also appealing.

Our law firm is still accepting new clients for the Roundup Lawsuit.

Reach out to us today for a free consultation. 

Use the chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

The Roundup litigation continues to unfold, with the number of lawsuits steadily increasing.

According to the latest JPML filings, there are currently 4,281 Roundup Lawsuits consolidated into the multidistrict litigation.

An increase in the number of cases filed can be attributed to growing awareness among individuals who have been exposed to Roundup and are now experiencing health concerns.

Apart from consolidated litigation, other Roundup Lawsuits are ongoing across the country.

New Jersey is considering the establishment of a multi-county litigation (MCL) for Roundup cancer claims in the state, and other individual lawsuits filed in state courts have resulted in significant verdicts.

Produced by Monsanto, a subsidiary of Bayer AG, Roundup has been widely used by farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners.

These individuals, who have been exposed to the herbicide over extended periods, have been at the forefront of raising concerns regarding the potential health risks associated with glyphosate.

For those who have been exposed to Roundup and are now facing health issues, it’s crucial to understand the legal options available.

Seek legal advice and hold these companies accountable today. 

If you or someone you know is in this situation, reach out to TorHoerman law for a free consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page for a free case evaluation and to find out if you qualify for a Roundup Lawsuit instantly.

Bayer AG and Monsanto face continued legal challenges despite having settled billions in claims related to Roundup exposure.

The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in February 2024 that federal insecticide laws do not exempt the companies from lawsuits alleging failures to warn about Roundup’s risks.

The roundup herbicide have been linked to the following risks in individuals:

• Cancer, specifically Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
• Liver Damage
• Kidney Damage
• Reproductive Issues
• Developmental issues

The Court of Appeals decision comes amid Bayer’s consideration of employing the “Texas Two-Step,” a legal strategy aimed at channeling current and future claims through the U.S. bankruptcy system.

Bayer’s exploration of the Texas Two-Step follows a series of jury verdicts awarding approximately $4 billion to plaintiffs alleging harm from Roundup exposure.

The company, in light of these costly judgments, is reportedly seeking advice on how to convince a bankruptcy judge to halt upcoming trials within the year, aiming to settle over 50,000 pending cases.

The Texas Two-Step involves a company dividing itself to isolate liabilities in one entity while maintaining assets in another.

Essentially, Bayer is trying to establish another company to force into bankruptcy in order to release the liability from themselves.

This tactic has been scrutinized and previously attempted by other corporations, such as Johnson & Johnson and 3M Company, with varying degrees of success.

Legal experts, including former federal bankruptcy judge Bruce Markell, view Bayer’s consideration of this strategy as a desperate measure given recent judicial skepticism towards the Texas Two-Step in bankruptcy cases.

Bayer’s attempt to consolidate and settle the litigation through a settlement program in 2021 was thwarted when a federal judge dismissed the company’s proposal.

Since acquiring Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion and inheriting the Roundup lawsuits, Bayer has experienced a significant decline in market value, losing approximately 70 percent.

The Roundup litigation is ongoing and our lawyers are still accepting more cases. 

A request has been submitted for the centralization of ten Roundup cases, previously filed across four New Jersey counties, to be managed collectively in The Superior Court of New Jersey, the Atlantic County Vicinage.

The request is for Multicounty Litigation (MCL) Designation of Roundup cases in New Jersey.

The Atlantic County Vicinage refers to the administrative division of the New Jersey Superior Court that has jurisdiction over Atlantic County, which provides a structured system for the resolution of legal disputes.

A group of ten plaintiffs is seeking centralized management of their Roundup cases, with expectations to encompass over a hundred related lawsuits.

Plaintiffs argue that centralization will save judicial resources and prevent inconsistent rulings, given the cases share common legal and factual issues related to Roundup’s alleged harmful effects.

The request is made under New Jersey Rule 4:38A and the Multicounty Litigation Guidelines, allowing for the central management of cases that share common factual and legal issues.

The allegations against Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup, center on claims of negligence due to the company’s failure to warn users about the potential carcinogenic effects of glyphosate, the active ingredient in roundup.

Plaintiffs in numerous lawsuits argue that exposure to glyphosate has contributed to the development of Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) and other health issues, asserting that Monsanto had knowledge of the risks associated with its product but did not provide adequate warnings or safety instructions.

If you or a loved one has been exposed to Roundup and are experiencing health complications as a result, contact us today to explore your legal options for free. 

You can also use the free chatbot on this page to find out if you qualify for the Roundup Lawsuit. 

The Roundup litigation is ongoing 

Currently, a total of 4,253 Roundup lawsuits are pending consolidation according to the most recent JPML filings.

The increase from 4,203 Roundup lawsuits reported on February 1st to 4,253 lawsuits this past month can be attributed to more individuals coming forward to seek action against the makers of Roundup, due to health concerns surrounding the product.

Roundup is produced by Monsanto, which is now a subsidiary of Bayer AG.

The lawsuits claim that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, has caused or contributed to the development of cancer.

Individuals who have been exposed to Roundup over extended periods, such as farm workers, landscapers, and gardeners, have raised issues about a potential link between glyphosate exposure and roundup.

If you or a loved one has been exposed to Roundup and are experiencing health issues, it may be important to seek legal advice. 

Contact us today for a free consultation or use the chatbot on this page for immediate feedback. 

The Roundup litigation is still ongoing and our lawyers are accepting more cases. 

A Philadelphia jury imposed a hefty penalty of $2.25 billion on Bayer this year, in a case that implicated the popular Monsanto weed killer, Roundup, as cause for a cable technician’s blood cancer.

This is the largest verdict to date in the ongoing legal feud regarding Roundup.

The litigation started in 2020 when Bayer allocated over $10 billion to settle approximately 125,000 cases.

The controversy around Roundup is its link to non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Plaintiffs have started winning large verdicts from juries since last year and thousands of Roundup cases still remain with more being filed.

The attorneys argued Bayer failed to warn consumers about glyphosate, a known pesticide in Roundup.

Despite these settlements, Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, continues to assert the safety of Roundup.

They have, however, reformulated the consumer version to exclude glyphosate.

Bayer has plans to contest the cases, relying on extensive scientific findings and endorsements from leading health and scientific regulators globally that validate the safety and non-carcinogenic nature of Roundup.

John McKivison, a plaintiff in a recent Roundup case, testified that he used Roundup for 20 years which led to it frequently making contact with his skin.

He has been diagnosed with remission cancer but constantly worries about a recurrence.

The jury ruled in favor of McKivison, awarding him $250 million in actual damages and an added $2 billion for punitive damages.

Bayer filed a post-trial motion against the verdict, they claim the award and the grounds of the Philadelphia courts are unfair.

The company believes there isn’t evidence of McKivison incurring hundreds of millions of dollars in actual losses.

Bayer disputes the claim that glyphosate contributes to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, referring to studies that report incidents of the cancer at similar rates in Roundup users and the general population.

Roundup exposure legal proceedings began after the World Health Organization (WHO) voiced concerns about glyphosate in 2015.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a division of WHO, classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”

This was based on evidence from studies that pointed to an increased risk of cancer among glyphosate-exposed agricultural workers.

The IARC also cited strong evidence that glyphosate caused genetic and cellular damage in laboratory studies, all of which suggested potential cancer risks for people.

If you believe you may be impacted by exposure to Roundup, we recommend contacting TorHoerman Law for a complimentary consultation. 

You can also use the chatbot on this page to learn if you qualify for a Roundup lawsuit.

The Roundup Litigation is ongoing and our lawyers are still accepting more cases.

A U.S. appeals court declined to dismiss a Georgia doctor’s lawsuit against Bayer AG, claiming that its Roundup weedkiller caused cancer.

The court rejected Bayer’s argument that federal approval shielded it from state lawsuits over the product’s risks.

Bayer intends to continue defending its product despite investor pressure for settlements.

The ruling reduces the likelihood of the U.S. Supreme Court intervening.

Bayer had hoped for a favorable Supreme Court ruling to limit its liability.

The company faces over 50,000 claims related to Roundup despite settling most pending claims in 2020.

The plaintiff in this particular case, David Carson, alleges he developed cancer after using Roundup for years.

The appeals court revived Carson’s case, rejecting Bayer’s defense.

Bayer has experienced mixed success in previous trials but has also substantial verdicts, including a $2.25 billion verdict handed down in Philadelphia court last month.

If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

The Roundup Litigation is ongoing and our lawyers are still accepting more cases.

As of February 2024, there are a total of 4,203 Roundup Lawsuits pending in the Roundup MDL according to the most recent JPML filings.

Many Roundup Lawsuits have already been settled, and there have been recent and major jury verdicts awarded to victims who have filed individual Roundup Lawsuits.

Last month, Bayer was ordered to pay $2.25 billion to a Pennsylvania man who developed cancer after being exposed to Roundup.

If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing, and the Roundup Lawyers at TorHoerman Law are still speaking to potential clients about their circumstances.

Bayer has been ordered to pay $2.25 billion to a Pennsylvania man who claimed he developed cancer from using the company’s Roundup weedkiller.

The verdict includes $250 million in compensatory damages and $2 billion in punitive damages.

Bayer disputes the verdict and plans to appeal, arguing that it conflicts with scientific evidence and regulatory assessments.

This decision follows several other wins by plaintiffs suing Bayer over Roundup, but the company has also won some recent trials.

Around 165,000 claims have been filed against Bayer in the U.S. related to Roundup, most alleging a link to non-Hodgkins lymphoma.

Bayer acquired Roundup as part of its purchase of Monsanto in 2018.

The company had previously settled most cases for up to $9.6 billion but failed to secure a settlement for future cases, with over 50,000 claims remaining pending.

Despite significant losses in court, Bayer has insisted on fighting the cases rather than settling.

The company had considered breaking off its crop science business due to concerns about Roundup liability but recently decided to focus on internal reorganization instead.

If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.

The Roundup Lawsuit is ongoing, and the Roundup Lawyers at TorHoerman Law are still speaking to potential clients about their circumstances.

In the most recent Roundup Trial located in Philadelphia, the trial judge granted Nouryon Chemicals’ motion to dismiss, making Monsanto the sole defendant in the case.

This marks the beginning of Monsanto’s defense, and a verdict is expected late next week.

In an attempt to improve their chances after a series of losses, Monsanto introduced a new toxicologist in the trial.

This move did not work in their favor, as they tried to turn a fact witness into an expert witness, combining opinions in his testimony.

Plaintiff’s attorneys and the trial judge were not pleased with this tactic and moved to stop the testimony.

If you or a loved one were exposed to Roundup weed killer and subsequently were diagnosed with related health problems, you may be eligible to file a Roundup Lawsuit.

Contact TorHoerman Law for a free consultation. 

Use the chatbot on this page for an instant case evaluation.